Published November 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison of EXAFS foil spectra from around the world

  • 1. EXAFS Analysis, Bolingbrook, IL 60440 (United States)
  • 2. UOP LLC, a Honeywell Company, Des Plaines, IL 60017 (United States)
  • 3. LNLS - Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory, Caixa Postal 6192, CEP 13084-971, Campinas -SP (Brazil)
  • 4. PNC-XOR, APS, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 (United States)
  • 5. The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI 48642 (United States)
  • 6. CSRRI-IIT, MRCAT, BCPS Department, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616 (United States)
  • 7. ALS, LBNL, 1 cyclotron Rd, MS 80-114, Berkeley, Ca 94720 (United States)
  • 8. Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Menai NSW 2234 (Australia)
  • 9. Department of Geophysical Sciences and CARS, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 (United States)
  • 10. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720-3114 (United States)
  • 11. LMTG-CNRS-UPS-IRD, 14 av. Edouard Belin, F-31400 Toulouse (France)
  • 12. OSUG, 414 rue de la piscine, F-38400 St Martin d'Heres (France)
  • 13. Department of Physics, Goa University, Taleigao Plateau, Goa 403206 (India)
  • 14. NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (United States)
  • 15. SSRL, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, 94025 (United States)

Description

The EXAFS spectra of Cu and Pd foil from many different beamlines and synchrotrons are compared to address the dependence of the amplitude reduction factor (S02) on beamline specific parameters. Even though S02 is the same parameter as the EXAFS coordination number, the value for S02 is given little attention, and is often unreported. The S02 often differs for the same material due to beamline and sample attributes, such that no importance is given to S02-values within a general range of 0.7 to 1.1. EXAFS beamlines have evolved such that it should now be feasible to use standard S02 values for all EXAFS measurements of a specific elemental environment. This would allow for the determination of the imaginary energy (Ei) to account for broadening of the EXAFS signal rather than folding these errors into an effective S02-value. To test this concept, we model 11 Cu-foil and 6 Pd-foil EXAFS spectra from around the world to compare the difference in S02- and Ei-values.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/190/1/012032

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Physics. Conference Series (Online)
Journal Volume
190
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
[4 p.]
ISSN
1742-6596

Conference

Title
14. international conference on X-ray absorption fine structure
Acronym
XAFS14
Dates
26-31 Jul 2009
Place
Camerino (Italy)

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
42030021
Subject category
S37: INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY; S74: ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
ABSORPTION SPECTRA; ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COORDINATION NUMBER; COPPER; ERRORS; FINE STRUCTURE; FOILS; PALLADIUM; X-RAY SPECTRA; X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY
Descriptors DEC
ELEMENTS; EVALUATION; METALS; PLATINUM METALS; SPECTRA; SPECTROSCOPY; TRANSITION ELEMENTS