Published December 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Subjective and objective comparisons of image quality between ultra-high-resolution CT and conventional area detector CT in phantoms and cadaveric human lungs

  • 1. Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka (Japan)
  • 2. Department of CT Systems, Canon Medical Systems Corp., Otawara, Tochigi (Japan)

Description

To compare the image quality of the lungs between ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) and conventional area detector CT (AD-CT) images. Image data of slit phantoms (0.35, 0.30, and 0.15 mm) and 11 cadaveric human lungs were acquired by both U-HRCT and AD-CT devices. U-HRCT images were obtained with three acquisition modes: normal mode (U-HRCTN: 896 channels, 0.5 mm x 80 rows; 512 matrix), super-high-resolution mode (U-HRCTSHR: 1792 channels, 0.25 mm x 160 rows; 1024 matrix), and volume mode (U-HRCTSHR-VOL: non-helical acquisition with U-HRCTSHR). AD-CT images were obtained with the same conditions as U-HRCTN. Three independent observers scored normal anatomical structures (vessels and bronchi), abnormal CT findings (faint nodules, solid nodules, ground-glass opacity, consolidation, emphysema, interlobular septal thickening, intralobular reticular opacities, bronchovascular bundle thickening, bronchiectasis, and honeycombing), noise, artifacts, and overall image quality on a 3-point scale (1 = worst, 2 = equal, 3 = best) compared with U-HRCTN. Noise values were calculated quantitatively. U-HRCT could depict a 0.15-mm slit. Both U-HRCTSHR and U-HRCTSHR-VOL significantly improved visualization of normal anatomical structures and abnormal CT findings, except for intralobular reticular opacities and reduced artifacts, compared with AD-CT (p < 0.014). Visually, U-HRCTSHR-VOL has less noise than U-HRCTSHR and AD-CT (p < 0.00001). Quantitative noise values were significantly higher in the following order: U-HRCTSHR (mean, 30.41), U-HRCTSHR-VOL (26.84), AD-CT (16.03), and U-HRCTN (15.14) (p < 0.0001). U-HRCTSHR and U-HRCTSHR-VOL resulted in significantly higher overall image quality than AD-CT and were almost equal to U-HRCTN (p < 0.0001). Both U-HRCTSHR and U-HRCTSHR-VOL can provide higher image quality than AD-CT, while U-HRCTSHR-VOL was less noisy than U-HRCTSHR. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5491-2

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
28
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 5060-5068
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3