Benchmark results in vector atmospheric radiative transfer
Creators
- Kokhanovsky, Alexander A.1
- Budak, Vladimir P.2
- Cornet, Celine3
- Duan, Minzheng4
- Emde, Claudia5
- Katsev, Iosif L.6
- Klyukov, Dmitriy A.2
- Korkin, Sergey V.2
- C-Labonnote, L.3
- Mayer, Bernhard5
- Min, Qilong7
- Nakajima, Teruyuki8
- Ota, Yoshifumi9
- Prikhach, Alexander S.6
- Rozanov, Vladimir V.1
- Yokota, Tatsuya9
- and others
- 1. Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, O. Hahn Allee 1, D-28334 Bremen (Germany)
- 2. Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Krasnokazarmennaya 14, Moscow 11250 (Russian Federation)
- 3. Laboratoire d'Optique Atmospherique, UMR CNRS 8518, Bat. P5, Universite Lille 1, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex (France)
- 4. LAGEO, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100029 (China)
- 5. Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Muenchner Strasse 20, 82234 Wessling (Germany)
- 6. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Pr. Nezavisimosti 68, 220072 Minsk (Belarus)
- 7. Atmospheric Science Research Center, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12203 (United States)
- 8. Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba 277-8568 (Japan)
- 9. Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba 305-8506 (Japan)
Description
In this paper seven vector radiative transfer codes are inter-compared for the case of underlying black surface. They include three techniques based on the discrete ordinate method (DOM), two Monte-Carlo methods, the successive orders scattering method, and a modified doubling-adding technique. It was found that all codes give very similar results. Therefore, we were able to produce benchmark results for the Stokes parameters both for reflected and transmitted light in the cases of molecular, aerosol and cloudy multiply scattering media. It was assumed that the single scattering albedo is equal to one. Benchmark results have been provided by several studies before, including Coulson et al., Garcia and Siewert, Wauben and Hovenier, and Natraj et al. among others. However, the case of the elongated phase functions such as for a cloud and with a high angular resolution is presented here for the first time. Also in difference with other studies, we make inter-comparisons using several codes for the same input dataset, which enables us to quantify the corresponding errors more accurately.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.03.005Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.03.005;
- PII
- S0022-4073(10)00091-9;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
- Journal Volume
- 111
- Journal Issue
- 12-13
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1931-1946
- ISSN
- 0022-4073
- CODEN
- JQSRAE
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 44008319
- Subject category
- S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
- Descriptors DEI
- AEROSOLS; BENCHMARKS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DISCRETE ORDINATE METHOD; ERRORS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; POLARIZATION; RADIANT HEAT TRANSFER; STOKES PARAMETERS; SURFACES
- Descriptors DEC
- CALCULATION METHODS; COLLOIDS; DISPERSIONS; ENERGY TRANSFER; EVALUATION; HEAT TRANSFER; SOLS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.