Published March 7, 2002 | Version v1
Journal article

Automatic MR volume registration and its evaluation for the pelvis and prostate

  • 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (United States)
  • 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (United States) and Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (United States)

Description

A three-dimensional (3D) mutual information registration method was created and used to register MRI volumes of the pelvis and prostate. It had special features to improve robustness. First, it used a multi-resolution approach and performed registration from low to high resolution. Second, it used two similarity measures, correlation coefficient at lower resolutions and mutual information at full resolution, because of their particular advantages. Third, we created a method to avoid local minima by restarting the registration with randomly perturbed parameters. The criterion for restarting was a correlation coefficient below an empirically determined threshold. Experiments determined the accuracy of registration under conditions found in potential applications in prostate cancer diagnosis, staging, treatment and interventional MRI (iMRI) guided therapies. Images were acquired in the diagnostic (supine) and treatment position (supine with legs raised). Images were also acquired as a function of bladder filling and the time interval between imaging sessions. Overall studies on three patients and three healthy volunteers, when both volumes in a pair were obtained in the diagnostic position under comparable conditions, bony landmarks and prostate 3D centroids were aligned within 1.6± 0.2mm and 1.4±0.2 mm, respectively, values only slightly larger than a voxel. Analysis suggests that actual errors are smaller because of the uncertainty in landmark localization and prostate segmentation. Between the diagnostic and treatment positions, bony landmarks continued to register well, but prostate centroids moved towards the posterior 2.8-3.4 mm. Manual cropping to remove voxels in the legs was necessary to register these images. In conclusion, automatic, rigid body registration is probably sufficiently accurate for many applications in prostate cancer. For potential iMRI-guided treatments, the small prostate displacement between the diagnostic and treatment positions can probably be avoided by acquiring volumes in similar positions and by reducing bladder and rectal volumes. (author)

Availability note (English)

Available online at the Web site for the journal Physics in Medicine and Biology (ISSN 1361-6560) http://www.iop.org/

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Journal Volume
47
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 823-838
ISSN
0031-9155

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
33021019
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Descriptors DEI
CALCULATION METHODS; CARCINOMAS; DIAGNOSTIC USES; NMR IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PELVIS; PROSTATE; VOLUME
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; GLANDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MALE GENITALS; NEOPLASMS; ORGANS; RESONANCE; USES