Toxicity and risk factors after combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy in men ≥75 years with localized prostate cancer
Creators
- 1. Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Outpatient Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany)
- 2. Martini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany)
- 3. Department of Anaesthesiology, Center of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medicine Rostock (Germany)
- 4. Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany)
Description
Combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a favorable treatment option in non-metastatic prostate cancer. However, reports on toxicity and outcome have mainly focused on younger patients. We aimed to determine toxicity and biochemical control rates after combined HDR-BT and EBRT in men ≥75 years. From 1999 to 2015, 134 patients aged ≥75 years (median 76 years; 75–82 years) were identified. Patients received 18 Gy of HDR-BT (9 Gy/fraction on days 1 and 8) with an iridium-192 source. After 1 week, supplemental EBRT with a target dose of 50.4 Gy was started (delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions). Median follow-up time was 25 months (0–127 months). No severe (grade 4) gastrointestinal (GIT) or genitourinary (GUT) toxicities were observed. In 76 patients (56.7%), 3D conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and in 34.3% intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was applied. CRT-treated patients were at a 2.17-times higher risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31–3.57, p = 0.002) of experiencing GUT. GIT risks could be reduced by 78% using IMRT (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07–0.75, p = 0.015). Patients with a higher T stage (T2c–3a/b) were less likely to experience GIT or GUT (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29–0.85, p = 0.011 and HR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3–0.81, p = 0.005, respectively). HDR-BT/EBRT is a well-tolerated treatment option for elderly men ≥75 years with a limited number of comorbidities and localized intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. IMRT should be favored since side effects were significantly reduced in IMRT-treated patients.
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-018-1380-5Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
- Journal Volume
- 195
- Journal Issue
- 5
- Journal Page Range
- p. 374-382
- ISSN
- 0179-7158
- CODEN
- STONE4
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 51000422
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BRACHYTHERAPY; CARCINOMAS; DELAYED RADIATION EFFECTS; DOSE RATES; ELDERLY PEOPLE; EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY; FRACTIONATED IRRADIATION; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GY RANGE 01-10; MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE; MEN; METASTASES; PROSTATE; RADIATION DOSES; SIDE EFFECTS; SURVIVAL CURVES; TOXICITY
- Descriptors DEC
- ABSORBED DOSE RANGE; ADULTS; AGE GROUPS; AGED ADULTS; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS; BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS; BODY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; DOSES; GLANDS; GY RANGE; HUMAN POPULATIONS; IRRADIATION; MALE GENITALS; MALES; MAMMALS; MAN; MEDICINE; MINORITY GROUPS; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; POPULATIONS; PRIMATES; RADIATION DOSE RANGES; RADIATION EFFECTS; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; VERTEBRATES