Published June 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

A European perspective on dental cone beam computed tomography systems with a focus on optimisation utilising diagnostic reference levels

  • 1. Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), P.O. Box 14, FI-00881 Helsinki (Finland)
  • 2. University Hospital Limerick, Limerick (Ireland)
  • 3. University of Belgrade, Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences (VINCA), Belgrade (Serbia)
  • 4. National Radiation Protection Institute (NRPI), Prague (Czech Republic)
  • 5. Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève (Switzerland)
  • 6. Hôpitaux universitaires Paris-Sud (APHP), Paris Sud University Hospitals, Paris (France)
  • 7. Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN), Boeretang 200, BE-2400 Mol (Belgium)
  • 8. CAATS, 119 Grande Rue, 92310 Sevres (France)
  • 9. Ruđer Bošković Institute (RBI), Bijenicka 54, Zagreb (Croatia)
  • 10. HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki (Finland)

Description

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been available since the late 1990s for use in dentistry. European legislation requires optimisation of protection and the use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) as well as regular quality control (QC) of the imaging devices, which is well outlined in existing international recommendations. Nevertheless, the level of application is not known. Earlier studies have indicated that few European countries have established DRLs and that patient doses (exposure parameters) have not been properly optimised. The EURADOS Working Group 12—Dosimetry in Medical Imaging undertook a survey to identify existing practices in Member States. Questionnaires were developed to identify equipment types, clinical procedures performed, and exposure settings used. The surveys were circulated to 22 countries resulting in 28 responses from 13 countries. Variations were identified in the exposure factors and in the doses delivered to patients for similar clinical indicators. Results confirm that patient doses are still not properly optimised and DRLs are largely not established. There is a need to promote the importance of performing QC testing of dental CBCT equipment and to further optimise patient exposure by establishment and use of DRLs as a part of a continuous optimisation process. (opinion article)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/abdd05

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal Volume
41
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 442-451
ISSN
0952-4746
CODEN
JRPREA

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53052817
Subject category
S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Descriptors DEI
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; QUALITY CONTROL; RECOMMENDATIONS; TEETH
Descriptors DEC
CONTROL; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORAL CAVITY; RADIOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY