Evaluating a Historical Airborne Release Test with Modern Modeling Methods

Safety analysts throughout the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) complex rely on the data provided in the DOE Handbook, DOE-HDBK-3010, to determine source terms that may be incorporated into the document safety analyses. Most often, analysts simply take the bounding values due to time constraints or simply to bound calculations. This is a safe approach that helps avoid regulatory critique; however, it may not provide results that are meaningful or relevant to the conditions being evaluated. The derivation of the data, such as airborne release fractions (ARFs) and respirable fractions (RFs) in the Handbook often depend on very limited table-top and bench/laboratory experiments, as well as engineering judgment which may not be well substantiated, and may not be representative of the actual situation. One historical dataset included a test where a solid contaminant was sprinkled over a liquid gasoline pool and set on fire (also referred to as Mishima and Schwendiman's test later in this paper). The airborne release was measured over the duration of the burn, but then collected separately for a time after the burning was completed. It can be assumed that the collected contaminant in the latter period corresponds to re-suspended particles, whereas the earlier period collected contaminant includes a combination of directly released as well as early released re-suspended particles. This scenario was recently modeled using SIERRA/Fuego as part of a parametric sensitivity study, however there were some shortcomings of the analysis methods. First, the code at the time lacked a multi-component particle evaporation model, which is necessary to capture the particle size effect of liquid/solid particles that can dynamically evaporate the liquid component. Second, a particle sticking and resuspension model did not exist at the time of the study. Recent model implementation now permits the study be repeated with the improved physical models. In the earlier work, four potential mechanisms were considered to potentially contribute to the release of the particles. These were: 1. Evaporation Induced Entrainment (EIE); 2. Surface Agitation by Wind; 3. Surface Agitation by Boiling; 4. Residue Entrainment (Resuspension). The sensitivity study evaluated mechanism 1 and 3 in the above list. Parameters varied were selected to be a reflection of a practical range of test conditions. The varied parameters included the boiling duration, fuel height, injected mass, particle size, turbulence intensity, and initial particle height. The boiling duration was the most significant parameter. The most significant mechanism was no.3, Surface Agitation by Boiling. This paper reports the implementation of the new multi-component evaporation model and its effect on the findings from the previous effort. The Mishima and Schwendiman test was re-modeled with the new evaporation model, and the results of the re-evaluation are presented. (authors)