Published January 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Added diagnostic value of respiratory-gated 4D 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of liver lesions. A multicenter study

  • 1. University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan (Italy)
  • 2. San Gerardo Hospital, Nuclear Medicine, Monza (Italy)
  • 3. San Gerardo Hospital, Medical Physics, Monza (Italy)
  • 4. IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Nuclear Medicine, Milan (Italy)
  • 5. Santa Maria Nuova Hospital IRCCS, Nuclear Medicine, Reggio Emilia (Italy)
  • 6. Santa Maria Nuova Hospital IRCCS, Medical Physics, Reggio Emilia (Italy)
  • 7. Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw (Poland)
  • 8. Hopital Pierre Beregovoy, Service de Medecine Nucleaire, Nevers (France)
  • 9. University of Milan-Bicocca, Tecnomed Foundation, Monza (Italy)

Description

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the added diagnostic value of respiratory-gated 4D18F-FDG PET/CT in liver lesion detection and characterization in a European multicenter retrospective study. Fifty-six oncological patients (29 males and 27 females, mean age, 61.2 ± 11.2 years) from five European centers, submitted to standard 3D-PET/CT and liver 4D-PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated. Based on visual analysis, liver PET/CT findings were scored as positive, negative, or equivocal both in 3D and 4D PET/CT. The impact of 4D-PET/CT on the confidence in classifying liver lesions was assessed. PET/CT findings were compared to histology and clinical follow-up as standard reference and diagnostic accuracy was calculated for both techniques. At semi-quantitative analysis, SUVmax was calculated for each detected lesion in 3D and 4D-PET/CT. Overall, 72 liver lesions were considered for the analysis. Based on visual analysis in 3D-PET/CT, 32/72 (44.4%) lesions were considered positive, 21/72 (29.2%) negative, and 19/72 (26.4%) equivocal, while in 4D-PET/CT 48/72 (66.7%) lesions were defined positive, 23/72 (31.9%) negative, and 1/72 (1.4%) equivocal. 4D-PET/CT findings increased the confidence in lesion definition in 37/72 lesions (51.4%). Considering 3D equivocal lesions as positive, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.9, 70.0, and 83.1%, respectively, while the same figures were 67.7, 90.0, and 73.8% if 3D equivocal findings were included as negative. 4D-PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 97.8, 90.0, and 95.4%, respectively, considering equivocal lesions as positive and 95.6, 90.0, and 93.8% considering equivocal lesions as negative. The SUVmax of the liver lesions in 4D-PET (mean ± SD, 6.9 ± 3.2) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than SUVmax in 3D-PET (mean ± SD, 5.2 ± 2.3). Respiratory-gated PET/CT technique is a valuable clinical tool in diagnosing liver lesions, reducing 3D undetermined findings, improving diagnostic accuracy, and confidence in reporting. 4D-PET/CT also improved the quantification of SUVmax of liver lesions. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3795-0

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Journal Volume
45
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 102-109
ISSN
1619-7070
CODEN
EJNMA6