Published July 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Motives to adopt renewable electricity technologies: Evidence from Sweden

  • 1. Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg (Sweden)
  • 2. Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping (Sweden)

Description

The diffusion of renewable electricity technologies (RETs) has to speed up for countries to reach their, often ambitious, targets for renewable energy generation. This requires a large number of actors – including individuals, companies and other organizations – to adopt RETs. Policies will most likely be needed to induce adoption, but there is limited knowledge about what motivates RET adoption. The purpose of this paper is to complement and expand the available empirical evidence regarding motives to adopt RETs through a survey to over 600 RET adopters in Sweden. The main finding of the study is that there are many different motives to adopt RETs and that RET adopters are a heterogeneous group with regard to motives. Although environmental concerns, interest in the technology, access to an RE resource and prospects to generate economic revenues are important motives in general, adopters differ with regard to how large importance they attach to the same motive and each adopter can also have several different motives to adopt. There are also differences in motives between adopter categories (especially independent power producers vs. individuals and diversified companies) and between RETs (especially wind power vs. solar power). This implies that a variety of policy instruments might be needed to induce further adoption of a variety of RETs by a variety of adopter categories. - Highlights: • There are many different motives to adopt renewable electricity technologies (RETs). • Adopters attach different levels of importance to the same motive. • Adopters can have several different motives to adopt a particular RET. • Motives to adopt RETs differ between wind power, solar PV and small-scale hydro. • Motives to adopt RETs differ between IPPs, individuals and diversified companies.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.016

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.016;
PII
S0301-4215(17)30240-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
106
Journal Page Range
p. 547-559
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
48086566
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
ELECTRICITY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INVESTMENT; PUBLIC OPINION; RESOURCES; SOLAR ENERGY; SWEDEN; VELOCITY; WIND POWER
Descriptors DEC
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCES; EUROPE; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; POWER; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SCANDINAVIA; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.