Published June 2016
| Version v1
Journal article
Nuclear data uncertainty for criticality-safety: Monte Carlo vs. linear perturbation
- 1. Reactor Physics and Systems Behaviour Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen (Switzerland)
- 2. University of Florida, Gainsville (United States)
- 3. Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group NRG, Petten (Netherlands)
- 4. University of Uppsala (Sweden)
- 5. Nuclear Data Section, IAEA, Vienna (Austria)
Description
This work is presenting a comparison of results for different methods of uncertainty propagation due to nuclear data for 330 criticality-safety benchmarks. Covariance information is propagated to keff using either Monte Carlo methods (NUSS: based on existing nuclear data covariances, and TMC: based on reaction model parameters) or sensitivity calculations from MCNP6 coupled with nuclear data covariances. We are showing that all three methods are globally equivalent for criticality calculations considering the two first moments of a distribution (average and standard deviation), but the Monte Carlo methods lead to actual probability distributions, where the third moment (skewness) should not be ignored for safety assessments.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.01.042Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.anucene.2016.01.042;
- PII
- S0306-4549(16)30052-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Annals of Nuclear Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 92
- Journal Page Range
- p. 150-160
- ISSN
- 0306-4549
- CODEN
- ANENDJ
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47125190
- Subject category
- S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
- Descriptors DEI
- ASYMMETRY; BENCHMARKS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CRITICALITY; DATA COVARIANCES; DISTURBANCES; M CODES; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTIONS; REACTOR SAFETY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY
- Descriptors DEC
- CALCULATION METHODS; COMPUTER CODES; EVALUATION; FUNCTIONS; SAFETY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.