Published December 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Retrospective analysis of multi-institutional, patient-specific treatment planning results of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for gynecological cancer using V100%

  • 1. Saitama Medical University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center (Japan)
  • 2. St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Department of Radiology (Japan)
  • 3. Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology (Japan)

Description

The objective of this study was to clarify the usefuleness of the K parameters of the independent verification method using V100% (the volume of water receiving 100% of the prescription dose) for institutions implementing the high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy for gynecological cancer. The data of 249 plans of 11 institutions in Japan were used, and the constant K value obtained by a parameter fit for single-192Ir, two-192Ir, and three-192Ir systems was calculated. The predicted total dwell time calculated using the constant K value was defined as Tpr, and the total dwell time calculated using a radiation treatment planning system was defined as TRTP. The ratio of Tpr and TRTP for each plan was calculated. The constant K values (95% CI) obtained for each system outlined above were 1233 (1227–1240), 1205 (1199–1211), and 1171 (1167–1175), respectively. Regarding the Tpr/TRTP, the entire data were within 0.9–1.1. For accurate verification, it was clarified that constant K values should be calculated for each system. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission considers a difference of 20% between the prescribed total dose and the administered total dose as a reportable medical event. There is a need for a quick method to verify the accuracy with a minimum of 10% threshold of a plan. The constant K values in this study were obtained from multiple institutions, and the variation in the values among these institutions was small. The data obtained by this study may be used as a parameter of this verification method employed by numerous institutions, particularly those who have recently initiated HDR brachytherapy. In addition, for institutions already using this method, this data might be useful for the validation of the parameters which were used in such institutions.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine
Journal Volume
41
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 1069-1074
ISSN
0158-9938
CODEN
AUPMDI

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine