Published October 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Public attitudes towards marine aquaculture: A comparative analysis of Germany and Israel

  • 1. Recanati Institute of Maritime Studies, University of Haifa, Mt. Carmel, Haifa 31905 (Israel)
  • 2. School of Political Science, University of Haifa, Mt. Carmel, Haifa 31905 (Israel)
  • 3. Institute of Geography, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Ludewig-Meyn-Str. 14, 24098 Kiel (Germany)
  • 4. CRM, Coastal Research and Management, Tiessenkai 12, Kiel (Germany)

Description

We report on bi-national (Germany–Israel) research on relationships between public attitudes, behaviours and preferences related to marine aquaculture. Aquaculture's world-wide market share accounts for over half of all aquatic products. In many places, the sector's explosive growth has outstripped scientific knowledge and governance provisions. Small producers such as Israel and Germany seeking to expand domestic production must address environmental challenges posed by fish farming, stakeholder competition in crowded coastal zones and public/consumer receptiveness. Based on survey data obtained from both the countries, correlation analysis (Pearson's r-statistic) was used to test four hypotheses. Of these, one (positive relationship between coastal tourism and aquaculture attitudes) was supported in both countries. The hypothesis of positive relationships between lifestyle (environment/health) behaviours and aquaculture attitudes was supported only in Germany and the hypothesis of negative relationships between concern for the environment and aquaculture attitudes was supported only in Israel. These results are significant for policy, business, NGO and other stakeholders. Moreover, they point to the importance of this type of comparative research in improving our understanding of local factors influencing attitude-formation and inter-relationships. First, the tourism–aquaculture relationship found indicates potential synergies between two sectors reliant on the coastal zone that should be taken into account by planning authorities. The divergent environment–aquaculture results were especially interesting since in both countries, the primary concern regarding aquaculture expansion was environmental impacts. Closer inspection of the survey results revealed that this relationship may have been influenced by the orientation of environmental concerns in each population. Germans focus on depletion of wildstocks and Israelis on cage effluent and marine pollution. Another significant result is the relatively low level of knowledge/understanding about the aquaculture sector among the general public. There is therefore a dual challenge for policy-makers and planners: against the background of broad support for expanding sustainable aquaculture, there is also a need for improved communication of scientific information on aquaculture–environment interactions as well as on the quality and safety of aquacultured products.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.05.004

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envsci.2012.05.004;
PII
S1462-9011(12)00071-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Science and Policy
Journal Volume
22
Journal Page Range
p. 60-72
ISSN
1462-9011

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44101606
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
AQUACULTURE; ATTITUDES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY; FISHERIES; ISRAEL; PUBLIC OPINION; TOURISM
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EUROPE; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; MIDDLE EAST; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.