Summary of the Workshop
Creators
Description
Key observations and messages for the program of work of the RK and M project The workshop delivered a large amount of information, ideas and visions, and a provided a fruitful forum for multidisciplinary reflection and discussion. Key observations and messages from the workshop are as follows: - The importance of having a common glossary is confirmed. - It is of interest to the project to better understand the contents of the current bibliography on RK and M. - Examples of memory loss and records misuse or misplacement exist both inside and outside the nuclear field. - The relationship between regulation and RK and M preservation for the long-term needs to be better understood. - RK and M preservation or loss and recovery scenarios can be constructed based on a wide range of future human-development hypotheses. - The relationship between RK and M preservation and safeguards needs further clarification. - National archives are a promising venue as one of the multiple approaches for long-term RK and M preservation. - Records management alone will not equip future generations to deal with long-term stores. - It is important to preserve not only technical records, but also records on the history of the program, including its siting within a community (metadata). - The interest in the history of the program should also be looked at from a heritage viewpoint. - Understanding the many ways that clues and records can be left in order that knowledge may be reconstituted by generations beyond those immediately succeeding us is important in this context. - In the same vein, while we must operate on the assumption that the intra-generational transmission chain continues to preserve RK and M, we have also to reach to farther-out generations directly in case the chain is broken. - The aim in reaching out to farther-out generations should be, as far as possible, that of informing them. - The set of data to be kept should be commensurate with the future need for the data and the difficulty of keeping them. - Standardization of messages may be useful when considering records for the farther future - that is, for the time when national programs may no longer be extant. - Operators and regulators would benefit from a clear national or international position on RK and M requirements. Overall there is interest in compiling the international requirements or, more simply, requests, that countries have to fulfil when dealing with post-closure situations
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Imprint Title
- The Preservation of Records, Knowledge and Memory (RK and M) Across Generations: Scoping the Issue. Workshop Proceedings Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 11-13 October 2011
- Imprint Pagination
- 113 p.
- Journal Page Range
- p. 11-38
- Report number
- NEA-RWM-R--2012-6
Conference
- Title
- Scoping the Issue
- Acronym
- Workshop on the Preservation of Records, Knowledge and Memory (RK and M) Across Generations
- Dates
- 11-13 Oct 2011
- Place
- Issy-les-Moulineaux (France)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA)
- Country of Input or Organization
- Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA)
- INIS RN
- 48072289
- Subject category
- S96: KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION; S12: MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES; CONTAMINATION; COORDINATED RESEARCH PROGRAMS; DOCUMENTATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE PRESERVATION; RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL; RADIOACTIVE WASTE FACILITIES; RECORDS MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDIZED TERMINOLOGY
- Descriptors DEC
- KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH PROGRAMS; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT
Optional Information
- Notes
- 8 refs.