Superconducting magnetic bearings with bulks and 2G HTS stacks: comparison between simulations using H and A-V formulations with measurements
- 1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
- 2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
Description
A-V and H are two of the most widespread formulations applied in the literature to calculate current distribution in high-temperature superconductors (HTSs). Both formulations can successfully solve problems related to large-scale HTS applications, but the way to implement the calculations is different. In recent years, several authors have chosen the H formulation to solve problems related to HTS applications. This choice can probably be attributed to the easy implementation of the H formulation with the aid of commercial finite element method (FEM) software, producing precise results and performing fast calculations. In a previous work, we proposed the use of the H formulation to solve superconducting magnetic bearing (SMB) problems. However, most of the SMB simulations presented in the literature are solved using the A-V formulation implemented with the finite difference method (FDM). Which of these two techniques is more suitable for superconducting magnetic bearing applications? This paper aims to answer this question. In order to do so, an experimental rig was developed to test SMBs using YBCO bulks or stacks of coated conductors. The simulated levitation force results from the A-V formulation using FDM and from the H formulation using FEM were compared with the experimental data. In general, the calculation time and the results error obtained with both formulations are comparable. It is worth mentioning that the main contribution of this paper is to present improvements to reduce the A-V formulation computational time and details of how to implement it using FDM in any platform. For this reason, most of this work is about the A-V formulation, while the H formulation is just presented for comparison. (paper)
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/aa9dc1Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Superconductor Science and Technology
- Journal Volume
- 31
- Journal Issue
- 2
- Journal Page Range
- [16 p.]
- ISSN
- 0953-2048
- CODEN
- SUSTEF
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 51068757
- Subject category
- S75: CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND SUPERFLUIDITY;
- Descriptors DEI
- BARIUM OXIDES; COPPER OXIDES; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HIGH-TC SUPERCONDUCTORS; LEVITATION; MAGNETIC BEARINGS; SIMULATION; YTTRIUM OXIDES
- Descriptors DEC
- ALKALINE EARTH METAL COMPOUNDS; BARIUM COMPOUNDS; BEARINGS; CALCULATION METHODS; CHALCOGENIDES; COPPER COMPOUNDS; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; SUPERCONDUCTORS; TRANSITION ELEMENT COMPOUNDS; TYPE-II SUPERCONDUCTORS; YTTRIUM COMPOUNDS