Published December 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Capturing the applicability of in vitro-in silico membrane transporter data in chemical risk assessment and biomedical research

  • 1. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (Italy)
  • 2. National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Jefferson, AR (United States)
  • 3. Klimeto, Juzna 4, Roznava (Slovakia)

Description

Highlights: • Membrane transporters (MTP) are key determinants of drug and chemical kinetics. • MTP studies are recommended during drug development. • MTP data is an essential puzzle piece for kinetics-based chemical risk assessment. • Integrated in vitro-in silico methods increase confidence in animal-free MTP data. Costs, scientific and ethical concerns related to animal tests for regulatory decision-making have stimulated the development of alternative methods. When applying alternative approaches, kinetics have been identified as a key element to consider. Membrane transporters affect the kinetic processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of various compounds, such as drugs or environmental chemicals. Therefore, pharmaceutical scientists have intensively studied transporters impacting drug efficacy and safety. Besides pharmacokinetics, transporters are considered as major determinant of toxicokinetics, potentially representing an essential piece of information in chemical risk assessment. To capture the applicability of transporter data for kinetic-based risk assessment in non-pharmaceutical sectors, the EU Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM) created a survey with a view of identifying the improvements needed when using in vitro and in silico methods. Seventy-three participants, from different sectors and with various kinds of expertise, completed the survey. The results revealed that transporters are investigated mainly during drug development, but also for risk assessment purposes of food and feed contaminants, industrial chemicals, cosmetics, nanomaterials and in the context of environmental toxicology, by applying both in vitro and in silico tools. However, to rely only on alternative methods for chemical risk assessment, it is critical that the data generated by in vitro and in silico methods are scientific integer, reproducible and of high quality so that they are trusted by decision makers and used by industry. In line, the respondents identified various challenges related to the interpretation and use of transporter data from non-animal methods. Overall, it was determined that a combined mechanistically-anchored in vitro-in silico approach, validated against available human data, would gain confidence in using transporter data within an animal-free risk assessment paradigm. Finally, respondents involved primarily in fundamental research expressed lower confidence in non-animal studies to unravel complex transporter mechanisms.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.122

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.122;
PII
S0048969718326068;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
645
Journal Page Range
p. 97-108
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53026597
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
CONSUMER PRODUCTS; DECISION MAKING; DRUGS; EXCRETION; FOOD; IN VITRO; KINETICS; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; METABOLISM; MONITORING; NANOMATERIALS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SILICA
Descriptors DEC
CLEARANCE; MATERIALS; MINERALS; OXIDE MINERALS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.