Lifecycle GHG emissions of palm biodiesel: Unintended market effects negate direct benefits of the Malaysian Economic Transformation Plan (ETP)
Creators
Description
Biodiesel expansion can lead to unintended effects that offset the direct GHG benefits of biofuels. Two documented unintended effects are the indirect land use change (ILUC) and indirect energy use change (IEUC). ILUC has been included in many lifecycle GHG studies of biofuels, but IEUC has remained relatively elusive. This paper presents an updated assessment of the lifecycle GHG emissions of palm biodiesel from Malaysia and, for the first time, incorporating the two estimated indirect effects simultaneously. Future GHG emissions of palm biodiesel are projected by taking into account of Malaysia's Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) that aims to reform the oil palm industry in order to achieve a high-income nation. Uncertainties associated with lifecycle GHG models were dealt with using Monte Carlo simulation in order to identify the breadth and likelihood of GHG reductions relative to petroleum-based fuels in the context of the European directives. This study has shown that the ETP, if successfully implemented, can significantly improve the direct GHG emissions of palm biodiesel, but the benefits are offset by the rise in global emissions due to ILUC and IEUC. Biofuel policies should also include IEUC, in addition to ILUC, to avoid GHG emissions leakages. - Highlights: • Estimate current and future lifecycle GHG emissions of Malaysian palm biodiesel. • Evaluate the GHG effects of Malaysia's Economic Transformation Plan (ETP). • Direct GHG benefits of biodiesel offset by indirect market effects. • Palm biodiesel unlikely to enable global GHG emissions reductions. • Global biofuel policy must account for indirect effects.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.041Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.041;
- PII
- S0301-4215(17)30050-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 104
- Journal Page Range
- p. 56-65
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48086410
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
- Descriptors DEI
- AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; BIODIESEL FUELS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GASES; INCOME; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MALAYSIA; MARKET; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OIL PALMS; PALM OIL; PETROLEUM
- Descriptors DEC
- ALTERNATIVE FUELS; ASIA; BIOFUELS; CALCULATION METHODS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; LILIOPSIDA; LIQUID FUELS; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; OILS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OTHER ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PLANTS; POLLUTION ABATEMENT; SIMULATION; TREES; VEGETABLE OILS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.