Published February 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Overcoming incumbent resistance to the clean energy shift: How local governments act as change agents in coal power station closures in China

  • 1. Emlyon Business School (France)
  • 2. Newcastle Business School, Faculty of Business and Law, University of Newcastle (Australia)
  • 3. School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW) (Australia)
  • 4. Discipline of Politics & International Relations, Macquarie School of Social Sciences at Macquarie University, Sydney (Australia)
  • 5. Department of Management, Macquarie University, Sydney (Australia)

Description

Highlights: • Closures of coal power plants take very different pace across provinces in China. • Local governments play critical roles in coal power decommission in Guangdong. • The retired coal power units in Guangdong have a short age in average. • The actions by local governments to close coal plants driven by a developmental logic. • The policy reflects both "destructive" and "constructive" goals. Phasing out the use of coal for power generation is an important concern for energy policy in the context of green transition. Despite the efforts of other nations, the role of China in the global phase-out of coal power remains crucial. Our study with a sub-national focus sheds important new light on the drivers and decision-making dynamics of exiting of coal power use in China. Based on a case study of closures of coal power plants in China's Guangdong province, we find that under certain circumstances, governments - especially those in the provincial and city levels - can and do act as change agents when it comes to retirement of coal fired power stations. Our study reveals a number of push and pull mechanisms that governments have utilized to overcome the resistance of incumbent power generation companies, primarily based on developmental considerations. By identifying the drivers and enabling mechanisms of phasing out the use of coal power in a significant sub-national region in China, our study contributes to both of the sustainability transition literature and the energy policy literature.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112058

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112058;
PII
S0301421520307692;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
149
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54023846
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S20: FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS;
Descriptors DEI
COAL; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS; POWER GENERATION; SUSTAINABILITY
Descriptors DEC
CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; MATERIALS; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.