Published August 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Risk factors for radiotherapy incidents and impact of an online electronic reporting system

  • 1. Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne (Australia)
  • 2. Department of Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne (Australia)
  • 3. Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne (Australia)
  • 4. Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne (Australia)
  • 5. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne (Australia)
  • 6. Department of Information Technology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne (Australia)

Description

Background and purpose: To ascertain the rate, type, significance, trends and the potential risk factors associated with radiotherapy incidents in a large academic department. Materials and methods: Data for all radiotherapy activities from July 2001 to January 2011 were reviewed from radiotherapy incident reporting forms. Patient and treatment data were obtained from the radiotherapy record and verification database (MOSAIQ) and the patient database (HOSPRO). Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine variables associated with radiotherapy incidents. Results: In that time, 65,376 courses of radiotherapy were delivered with a reported incident rate of 2.64 per 100 courses. The rate of incidents per course increased (1.96 per 100 courses to 3.52 per 100 courses, p < 0.001) whereas the proportion of reported incidents resulting in >5% deviation in dose (10.50 to 2.75%, p < 0.001) had decreased after the introduction of an online electronic reporting system. The following variables were associated with an increased rate of incidents: afternoon treatment time, paediatric patients, males, inpatients, palliative plans, head-and-neck, skin, sarcoma and haematological malignancies. In general, complex plans were associated with higher incidence rates. Conclusion: Radiotherapy incidents were infrequent and most did not result in significant dose deviation. A number of risk factors were identified and these could be used to highlight high-risk cases in the future. Introduction of an online electronic reporting system resulted in a significant increase in the number of incidents being reported

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.07.011

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radonc.2014.07.011;
PII
S0167-8140(14)00306-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Journal Volume
112
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 199-204
ISSN
0167-8140
CODEN
RAONDT

INIS

Country of Publication
Ireland
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47007927
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ACCIDENTS; ERRORS; HAZARDS; HEAD; NECK; PATIENTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEWS; SARCOMAS; SKIN; VERIFICATION
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; DOSES; MATHEMATICS; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; STATISTICS; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.