Published July 1, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

How Do the ASTRO Consensus Statement Guidelines for the Application of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Fit Intraoperative Radiotherapy? A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Treated at the European Institute of Oncology

  • 1. Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy)
  • 2. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy)
  • 3. Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy)
  • 4. Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy)
  • 5. Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy)
  • 6. University of Milan (Italy)

Description

Purpose: To verify how the classification according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) consensus statement (CS) for the application of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) fits patients treated with intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) at a single institution. Methods and Materials: The study included 1,822 patients treated with ELIOT as the sole radiation modality outside of a clinical trial at the European Institute of Oncology after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer, who were classified into CS groups of suitable, cautionary, and unsuitable. The outcome in terms of ipsilateral breast recurrence, regional node relapse, distant metastases, progression free-survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival were assessed. Results: All the 1,822 cases except for 25 could be classified according to ASTRO CS: 294 patients met the criteria for inclusion into the suitable group, 691 patients into the cautionary group, and 812 patients into the unsuitable group. The 5-year rate of ipsilateral breast recurrence for suitable, cautionary, and unsuitable groups were 1.5%, 4.4%, and 8.8%, respectively (p = 0.0003). Whereas the regional node relapse showed no difference, the rate of distant metastases was significantly different in the unsuitable group compared with the suitable and cautionary groups, having a significant impact on survival. Conclusion: In the context of patients treated with ELIOT, the ASTRO guidelines identify well the groups for whom APBI might be considered as an effective alternative to whole breast radiotherapy and also identify groups for whom APBI is not indicated.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.014

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.014;
PII
S0360-3016(11)03168-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
83
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 806-813
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44019360
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIALS; ELECTRONS; IRRADIATION; MAMMARY GLANDS; METASTASES; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; SURGERY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DISEASES; ELEMENTARY PARTICLES; FERMIONS; GLANDS; LEPTONS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; TESTING; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.