How Do the ASTRO Consensus Statement Guidelines for the Application of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Fit Intraoperative Radiotherapy? A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Treated at the European Institute of Oncology
Creators
- 1. Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy)
- 2. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy)
- 3. Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy)
- 4. Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy)
- 5. Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology, Milan (Italy)
- 6. University of Milan (Italy)
Description
Purpose: To verify how the classification according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) consensus statement (CS) for the application of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) fits patients treated with intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) at a single institution. Methods and Materials: The study included 1,822 patients treated with ELIOT as the sole radiation modality outside of a clinical trial at the European Institute of Oncology after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer, who were classified into CS groups of suitable, cautionary, and unsuitable. The outcome in terms of ipsilateral breast recurrence, regional node relapse, distant metastases, progression free-survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival were assessed. Results: All the 1,822 cases except for 25 could be classified according to ASTRO CS: 294 patients met the criteria for inclusion into the suitable group, 691 patients into the cautionary group, and 812 patients into the unsuitable group. The 5-year rate of ipsilateral breast recurrence for suitable, cautionary, and unsuitable groups were 1.5%, 4.4%, and 8.8%, respectively (p = 0.0003). Whereas the regional node relapse showed no difference, the rate of distant metastases was significantly different in the unsuitable group compared with the suitable and cautionary groups, having a significant impact on survival. Conclusion: In the context of patients treated with ELIOT, the ASTRO guidelines identify well the groups for whom APBI might be considered as an effective alternative to whole breast radiotherapy and also identify groups for whom APBI is not indicated.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.014Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.014;
- PII
- S0360-3016(11)03168-3;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
- Journal Volume
- 83
- Journal Issue
- 3
- Journal Page Range
- p. 806-813
- ISSN
- 0360-3016
- CODEN
- IOBPD3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 44019360
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIALS; ELECTRONS; IRRADIATION; MAMMARY GLANDS; METASTASES; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; SURGERY
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DISEASES; ELEMENTARY PARTICLES; FERMIONS; GLANDS; LEPTONS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; TESTING; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.