Published August 1, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery

Description

Highlights: •Organic Flash Regenerative Cycles were introduced (OFRCs). •A technical and economic comparison with traditional Organic Flash Cycle (OFCs) was carried out. •Different organic fluids were analyzed. •Results show that specific costs of OFRCs are lower than OFCs. •OFRCs can be a valid alternative to ORCs for low temperature heat recovery. -- Abstract: Organic Flash Cycles (OFCs) can improve the overall efficiency of waste heat recovery or geothermal systems due to a better match of the hot and cold heat transfer curves. However, the lower mean temperature difference between the heat transfer curves implies larger exchanger areas and therefore higher heat exchanger costs. In order to reduce the exchanger size, a new cycle configuration is introduced in this paper, consisting in a new type of organic flash regenerative cycle (OFRC) for heat source temperatures in the range 80–170 °C. The regeneration allows to recover part of the enthalpy of the liquid phase from the flash evaporator increasing the temperature of the liquid at the exchanger inlet, thus reducing the exchanger size. The thermodynamic performance of OFRCs are practically the same as of the OFC, but the unit cost of the system per kW installed power can be 20% lower. A variety of working fluids was tested and results have shown that long molecular chain alkanes provide the best thermodynamic efficiency, but those fluids have the main drawback of a low vapor density, resulting in very large expansion devices and condensers. R601a is the working fluid featuring the best tradeoff between thermodynamic efficiency and components size in the heat source temperature range between 80 °C and 170 °C. The comparison of the OFRC with conventional ORCs has shown the thermodynamic superiority of the OFRC with every tested fluid. Finally the cost analysis has highlighted that OFRCs specific cost has the same magnitude as ORCs for mini and micro scale plants.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.058

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.058;
PII
S0306-2619(17)30454-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Energy
Journal Volume
199
Journal Issue
Complete
Journal Page Range
p. 69-87
ISSN
0306-2619
CODEN
APENDX

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49045189
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; HEAT RECOVERY; HEAT SOURCES; HEAT TRANSFER; RANKINE CYCLE; TEMPERATURE RANGE 0065-0273 K; THERMODYNAMICS; WASTE HEAT; WORKING FLUIDS
Descriptors DEC
ECONOMICS; ENERGY; ENERGY RECOVERY; ENERGY TRANSFER; FLUIDS; HEAT; TEMPERATURE RANGE; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES; WASTES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.