Published October 2010 | Version v1
Journal article

Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) modeling of late rectal bleeding following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A Test of the QUANTEC-recommended NTCP model

  • 1. Fraser Valley Centre, British Columbia Cancer Centre, Surrey, BC (Canada)
  • 2. Vancouver Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC (Canada)
  • 3. Dept. of Radiation Oncology and the Mallinckrodt Inst. of Radiology, Washington Univ., St. Louis, MO (United States)

Description

Purpose/background. Validating a predictive model for late rectal bleeding following external beam treatment for prostate cancer would enable safer treatments or dose escalation. We tested the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model recommended in the recent QUANTEC review (quantitative analysis of normal tissue effects in the clinic). Material and methods. One hundred and sixty one prostate cancer patients were treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer at the British Columbia Cancer Agency in a prospective protocol. The total prescription dose for all patients was 74 Gy, delivered in 2 Gy/fraction. 159 3D treatment planning datasets were available for analysis. Rectal dose volume histograms were extracted and fitted to a Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP model. Results. Late rectal bleeding (>grade 2) was observed in 12/159 patients (7.5%). Multivariate logistic regression with dose-volume parameters (V50, V60, V70, etc.) was non-significant. Among clinical variables, only age was significant on a Kaplan-Meier log-rank test (p=0.007, with an optimal cut point of 77 years). Best-fit Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model parameters (with 95% confidence intervals) were: n = 0.068 (0.01, +infinity); m =0.14 (0.0, 0.86); and TD50 81 (27, 136) Gy. The peak values fall within the 95% QUANTEC confidence intervals. On this dataset, both models had only modest ability to predict complications: the best-fit model had a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of rs = 0.099 (p = 0.11) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.62; the QUANTEC model had rs=0.096 (p= 0.11) and a corresponding AUC of 0.61. Although the QUANTEC model consistently predicted higher NTCP values, it could not be rejected according to the χ2 test (p = 0.44). Conclusions. Observed complications, and best-fit parameter estimates, were consistent with the QUANTEC-preferred NTCP model. However, predictive power was low, at least partly because the rectal dose distribution characteristics do not vary greatly within this patient cohort.

Availability note (English)

Available from DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2010.509736

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Acta Oncologica (online)
Journal Volume
49
Journal Issue
7
Journal Page Range
p. 1040-1044
ISSN
1651-226X

INIS

Country of Publication
Sweden
Country of Input or Organization
Sweden
INIS RN
41117248
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
EXTERNAL IRRADIATION; PROSTATE; RADIOTHERAPY; RECTUM; SIDE EFFECTS
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GLANDS; INTESTINES; IRRADIATION; LARGE INTESTINE; MALE GENITALS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY