Survey of numerical methods for hydraulic transients
Description
The finite difference methods of Lax, Lax-Wendroff (two-step), donor cell type and finite-element method using Galerkin procedure with B-splines as approximating functions are compared with the method of characteristics for the solution of water-hammer transients as typified by valve closure problems. From the point of view of accuracy, the two-step Lax-Wendroff method and the method of characteristics are comparable and produce the best results. The Lax methods fair worst. The donor cell type and the Galerkin procedure with quadratic B-spline basis as approximating functions display roughly the same accuracy. From the comparison presented, it appears that Galerkin technique offers no substantial advantage over the other finite-difference methods except that of ease in handling boundary conditions as compared to finite-difference methods
Availability note (English)
MF available from INIS under the Report Number; Available from NTIS., PC A05/MF A01.
Files
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- 80 p.
- Report number
- ANL--77-81
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 9379432
- Subject category
- S42: ENGINEERING;
- Descriptors DEI
- FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID FLOW; HYDRAULICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SHOCK WAVES; TRANSIENTS; WATER HAMMER
- Descriptors DEC
- ITERATIVE METHODS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION