Published May 21, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Diagnostic performance of contrast enhanced CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in suspicious recurrence of biliary tract cancer after curative resection

  • 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. Department of Molecular Medicine & Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 3. Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 5. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)

Description

Because of the late clinical presentation of biliary tract cancer (BTC), only 10% of patients are eligible for curative surgery. Even among those patients who have undergone curative surgery, most patients develop recurrent cancer. This study is to determine the clinical role of 18F-FDG PET/CT during post-operative surveillance of suspected recurrent BTC based on symptoms, laboratory findings and contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) findings. We consecutively enrolled 50 patients with BTC who underwent curative surgery. An 18F-FDG PET/CT was obtained for assessment of recurrence based on clinical suspicion during post-operative surveillance. The final confirmation of recurrence was determined pathologically or clinically. When a pathologic confirmation was impossible or inconclusive, a clinical confirmation was used by radiologic correlation with subsequent follow-up ceCT at a minimum of 3-month intervals. Diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by comparing the results of ceCT and 18F-FDG PET/CT with the final diagnosis. Among the 50 patients, 34(68%) were confirmed to have a recurrence. PET/CT showed higher sensitivity (88% vs. 76%, p = 0.16) and accuracy (82% vs. 66%, p = 0.11) for recurrence compared to ceCT, even though the difference was not significant. The positive (86% vs. 74%, p = 0.72) and negative predictive values for recurrence (73% vs. 47%, p = 0.55) were not significantly different between PET/CT and ceCT. However, an additional PET/CT on ceCT significantly improved the sensitivity than did a ceCT alone (94% [32/34] for PET/CT on ceCT vs. 76% [26/34] for ceCT alone, p = 0.03) without increasing the specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. 18F-FDG PET/CT alone is not more sensitive or specific than ceCT in the detection of recurrent BTC after curative surgery. These results do not reach statistical significance, probably due to the low number of patients. However, an additional 18F-FDG PET/CT on ceCT significantly improves the sensitivity of detecting recurrences

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-188; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3120804

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
BMC cancer (Online)
Journal Volume
11
Journal Page Range
p. 188
ISSN
1471-2407

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46098962
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ACCURACY; BILIARY TRACT; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; INSPECTION; MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE; MONITORING; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; PERFORMANCE; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY; SURGERY
Descriptors DEC
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; MEDICINE; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c)2011 Lee et al
Notes
PMCID: PMC3120804; PUBLISHER-ID: 1471-2407-11-188; PMID: 21599995; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3120804; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.