Published November 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Enhancements in Biomass-to-Liquid processes: Gasification aiming at high hydrogen/carbon monoxide ratios for direct Fischer-Tropsch synthesis applications

  • 1. Renewable Energies & Environmental R&D Center - Istituto Guido Donegani, Eni S. p. A., Via Fauser 4, 28100 Novara (Italy)
  • 2. Dahlman Renewable Technology B.V., Scheldeweg 10, 3144ES Maassluis (Netherlands)
  • 3. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), Westerduinweg 3, 1755LE Petten (Netherlands)
  • 4. DCCI, Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Genova, Via Dodecaneso 31, 16146 Genova (Italy)

Description

The Fischer-Tropsch process is one of the possible routes to produce synthetic liquid fuels and chemicals employed on large scale in Gas-to-Liquid and Coal-to-Liquid processes, after appropriate transformation of respective fossil sources into syngas. However, syngas can be produced by biomass gasification as well. One of the main problems is the need to ensure high H2/CO ratio to allow the Fischer-Tropsch reaction to occur, operation commonly achieved by resorting to a Water-gas shift step. The present work reports an experimental study on biomass gasification. The aim was to set up a more efficient Biomass-to-Liquid process, which ensures a high H2/CO ratio syngas suitable for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis directly from biomass gasification. In this way, it is possible to remove the Water-gas shift section and consequently make biofuels production more attractive, reducing costs and plant complexity. Two types of biomass have been tested: softwood from forest residues and fast growing crops. Moreover, a bubbling fluidized bed reactor and an indirect gasifier with internal circulating fluidized bed have been used. Gasification tests have been conducted by running gasifiers with both inert and catalytic bed materials. The results have shown that, using the direct gasifier with catalytic bed and a proper configuration, H2/CO molar ratio of 2 can been obtained even at low temperature and low steam/biomass ratio, whereas this is not the case in the indirect one. However, tests suggest that an inverted configuration would make it possible to obtain values near two also with indirect gasifiers, resulting in a new interesting approach. - Highlights: • MILENA gasifier potentialities were explored in comparison with a conventional BFB. • Aim was to find the configurations to maximize benefits and process simplification. • Biomass from two classes were tested in inert and active beds at various conditions. • High H2/CO ratio can be obtained via a fine tuning of operating conditions for BFB. • An "inverted" MILENA could also avoid WGS besides ASU unit improving BtL efficiency.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.022

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.022;
PII
S0961-9534(17)30266-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Biomass and Bioenergy
Journal Volume
106
Journal Page Range
p. 104-114
ISSN
0961-9534
CODEN
BMSBEO

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.