Published September 15, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

An inexact optimization model for regional electric system steady operation management considering integrated renewable resources

  • 1. School of Science, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044 (China)
  • 2. Key Laboratory of Regional Energy System Optimization, Ministry of Education, S-C Resources and Environmental Research Academy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206 (China)

Description

In this study, an inexact two-stage stochastic fuzzy programming (ITSFP) is developed for regional power generation planning with considering the intermittency and fuzziness of renewable energy power output. ITSFP incorporates interval-parameter programming (IPP), two-stage stochastic programming (TSP), and fuzzy credibility constrained programming (FCCP) within a general optimization framework which can tackle uncertainties expressed as intervals, probability distributions, and fuzzy sets. The developed method is applied to a regional electric power system over a one-day optimization horizon coupled with air pollution control. The power generation schemes, imported electricity, and system cost under various environmental goals and risk preferences are analyzed. The obtained results indicate that the model can provide a linkage between predefined electric power generation schedule and the relevant economic implications, as well as more reasonable decision alternatives for decision makers by loosening system constraints at specified confidence level. Besides, the fuzziness of forecast error corresponding to the variability of renewable energy resources could be effectively reflected. Moreover, the results are useful for addressing the trade-off between system economy and system risk. - Highlights: • An inexact stochastic-fuzzy programming is proposed for generation scheduling. • Uncertainties are expressed as intervals, probability distributions and fuzzy sets. • Power generation schemes, imported electricity, and system cost are analyzed. • Alternative solutions associated with different confidence levels are obtained. • Tradeoffs between system economic and reliability risk could be evaluated.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.053

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.053;
PII
S0360-5442(17)31047-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
135
Journal Page Range
p. 195-209
ISSN
0360-5442
CODEN
ENEYDS

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49063304
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
ELECTRIC POWER; FUZZY LOGIC; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; OPTIMIZATION; POWER GENERATION; POWER SYSTEMS; PROGRAMMING; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY SOURCES; ENERGY SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; POWER

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.