Local Control Rates of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) to Thoracic, Abdominal, and Soft Tissue Lesions Using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)
Creators
- 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1665 Aurora Court, Room 1032, Aurora, CO 80045 (United States)
- 2. University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa (United States)
- 3. Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City (Mexico)
- 4. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado (United States)
Description
We report the radiographic response rate of SBRT compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CF-EBRT) for thoracic, abdominal, skin and soft tissue RCC lesions treated at our institution. Fifty three lesions where included in the study (36 SBRT, 17 CF-EBRT), treated from 2004 to 2014 at our institution. We included patients that had thoracic, skin & soft tissue (SST), and abdominal metastases of histologically confirmed RCC. The most common SBRT fractionation was 50 Gy in 5 fractions. The median time of follow-up was 16 months (range 3–97 months). Median BED was 216.67 (range 66.67–460.0) for SBRT, and 60 (range 46.67–100.83) for CF-EBRT. Median radiographic local control rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 100, 93.41, and 93.41 % for lesions treated with SBRT versus 62.02, 35.27 and 35.27 % for those treated with CF-EBRT (p < 0.001). Predictive factors for radiographic local control under univariate analysis included BED ≥ 100 Gy (HR, 0.048; 95 % CI, 0.006–0.382; p = 0.005), dose per fraction ≥ 9 Gy (HR, 0.631; 95 % CI, 0.429–0.931; p = 0.021), and gender (HR, 0.254; 95 % CI, 0.066–0.978; p = 0.048). Under multivariate analysis, there were no significant predictors for local control. Toxicity rates were low and equivalent in both groups, with no grade 4 or 5 side effects reported. SBRT is safe and effective for the treatment of RCC metastases to thoracic, abdominal and integumentary soft tissues. Radiographic response rates were greater and more durable using SBRT compared to CF-EBRT. Further prospective trials are needed to evaluate efficacy and safety of SBRT for RCC metastases
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0528-z; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4625576Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiation Oncology (Online)
- Journal Volume
- 10
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 1748-717X
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47070096
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ANIMAL TISSUES; CARCINOMAS; FRACTIONATION; GY RANGE 01-10; GY RANGE 10-100; KIDNEYS; METASTASES; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY; SIDE EFFECTS
- Descriptors DEC
- ABSORBED DOSE RANGE; BODY; DISEASES; DOSES; GY RANGE; MATHEMATICS; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIATION DOSE RANGES; RADIOLOGY; SEPARATION PROCESSES; STATISTICS; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) Altoos et al. 2015
- Notes
- PMCID: PMC4625576; PMID: 26510665; PUBLISHER-ID: 528; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4625576