Published October 26, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article

Seismic and Aseismic Preparatory Processes Before Large Stick–Slip Failure

  • 1. Universität Potsdam. Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences (Germany)
  • 2. Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, German Research Centre for Geosciences GFZ (Germany)
  • 3. Freie Universität Berlin. Department of Earth Sciences (Germany)
  • 4. University of Memphis. Department of Earth Sciences, Memphis Center for Earthquake Research and Information (United States)
  • 5. University of Southern California and Southern California Earthquake Center. Department of Earth Sciences (United States)

Description

Natural earthquakes often have very few observable foreshocks which significantly complicates tracking potential preparatory processes. To better characterize expected preparatory processes before failures, we study stick-slip events in a series of triaxial compression tests on faulted Westerly granite samples. We focus on the influence of fault roughness on the duration and magnitude of recordable precursors before large stick–slip failure. Rupture preparation in the experiments is detectable over long time scales and involves acoustic emission (AE) and aseismic deformation events. Preparatory fault slip is found to be accelerating during the entire pre-failure loading period, and is accompanied by increasing AE rates punctuated by distinct activity spikes associated with large slip events. Damage evolution across the fault zones and surrounding wall rocks is manifested by precursory decrease of seismic b-values and spatial correlation dimensions. Peaks in spatial event correlation suggest that large slip initiation occurs by failure of multiple asperities. Shear strain estimated from AE data represents only a small fraction (< 1%) of total shear strain accumulated during the preparation phase, implying that most precursory deformation is aseismic. The relative contribution of aseismic deformation is amplified by larger fault roughness. Similarly, seismic coupling is larger for smooth saw-cut faults compared to rough faults. The laboratory observations point towards a long-lasting and continuous preparation process leading to failure and large seismic events. The strain partitioning between aseismic and observable seismic signatures depends on fault structure and instrument resolution.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Pure and Applied Geophysics
Journal Volume
177
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 5741-5760
ISSN
0033-4553
CODEN
PAGYAV

INIS

Country of Publication
Switzerland
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
56004299
Subject category
S58: GEOSCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
AFTERSHOCKS; COMPRESSION; CORRELATIONS; DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKES; FAILURES; FORESHOCKS; ROCKS; ROUGHNESS; RUPTURES; SEISMIC NOISE; SEISMIC P WAVES; SEISMOGRAPHS; SHEAR; SLIP; STRAINS
Descriptors DEC
FAILURES; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; NOISE; SEISMIC EVENTS; SEISMIC WAVES; SURFACE PROPERTIES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 © The Author(s) 2020