Published January 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison of hybrid and baseline ELMy H-mode confinement in JET with the carbon wall

  • 1. EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Division of Fusion Plasma Physics, Association EURATOM-VR, KTH, SE-10044 Stockholm (Sweden)
  • 3. General Atomics, PO Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186-5608 (United States)
  • 4. Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, D-85748 Garching (Germany)
  • 5. Association Euratom-CEA, Cadarache, F-13108 St. Paul-lez-Durance, Cedex (France)
  • 6. Associazione EURATOM-ENEA sulla Fusione, C.R. Frascati, Frascati (Italy)
  • 7. Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD (United Kingdom)
  • 8. Istituto di Fisica del Plasma 'P. Caldirola', Associazione Euratom-ENEA-CNR, Milano,Italy (Italy)

Description

The confinement in JET baseline type I ELMy H-mode plasmas is compared to that in so-called hybrid H-modes in a database study of 112 plasmas in JET with the carbon fibre composite (CFC) wall. The baseline plasmas typically have βN ∼ 1.5–2, H98 ∼ 1, whereas the hybrid plasmas have βN ∼ 2.5–3, H98 < 1.5. The database study contains both low- (δ ∼ 0.2–0.25) and high-triangularity (δ ∼ 0.4) hybrid and baseline H-mode plasmas from the last JET operational campaigns in the CFC wall from the period 2008–2009. Based on a detailed confinement study of the global as well as the pedestal and core confinement, there is no evidence that the hybrid and baseline plasmas form separate confinement groups; it emerges that the transition between the two scenarios is of a gradual kind rather than demonstrating a bifurcation in the confinement. The elevated confinement enhancement factor H98 in the hybrid plasmas may possibly be explained by the density dependence in the τ98 scaling as n0.41 and the fact that the hybrid plasmas operate at low plasma density compared to the baseline ELMy H-mode plasmas. A separate regression on the confinement data in this study shows a reduction in the density dependence as n0.09±0.08. Furthermore, inclusion of the plasma toroidal rotation in the confinement regression provides a scaling with the toroidal Alfvén Mach number as MachA0.41±0.07 and again a reduced density dependence as n0.15±0.08. The differences in pedestal confinement can be explained on the basis of linear MHD stability through a coupling of the total and pedestal poloidal pressure and the pedestal performance can be improved through plasma shaping as well as high β operation. This has been confirmed in a comparison with the EPED1 predictive pedestal code which shows a good agreement between the predicted and measured pedestal pressure within 20–30% for a wide range of βN ∼ 1.5–3.5. The core profiles show a strong degree of pressure profile consistency. No beneficial effect of core density peaking on confinement could be identified for the majority of the plasmas presented here as the density peaking is compensated by a temperature de-peaking resulting in no or only a weak variation in the pressure peaking. The core confinement could only be optimized in case the ions and electrons are decoupled, in which case the ion temperature profile peaking can be enhanced, which benefits confinement. In this study, the latter has only been achieved in the low-triangularity hybrid plasmas, and can be attributed to low-density operation. Plasma rotation has been found to reduce core profile stiffness, and can explain an increase in profile peaking at small radius ρtor = 0.3. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/53/1/013001

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Fusion
Journal Volume
53
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
[17 p.]
ISSN
0029-5515
CODEN
NUFUAU

Optional Information

Collaborations
JET-EFDA Contributors