Published 2022 | Version v1
Journal article

Regulated NiCu Cycles with the New 57Cu(p,γ)58Zn Reaction Rate and the Influence on Type-I X-Ray Bursts: GS 1826–24 Clocked Burster

  • 1. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 (China)
  • 2. Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000 (China)
  • 3. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000 (China)
  • 4. The Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 (United States)
  • 5. Center of Excellence for Astrophysics in Three Dimensions (ASTRO-3D) (Australia)
  • 6. OzGrav-Monash – MOCA, School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, VIC 3800 (Australia)
  • 7. School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Victoria 3800 (Australia)
  • 8. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 (United States)
  • 9. CENBG, CNRS/IN2P3 and University of Bordeaux, Chemin du Solarium, 33175 Gradignan cedex (France)

Description

In Type-I X-ray bursts (XRBs), the rapid-proton capture (rp-) process passes through the NiCu and ZnGa cycles before reaching the region above Ge and Se isotopes that hydrogen burning actively powers the XRBs. The sensitivity study performed by Cyburt et al. [1] shows that the 57Cu(p,γ)58Zn reaction in the NiCu cycles is the fifth most important rp-reaction influencing the burst light curves. Langer et al. [2] precisely measured some low-lying energy levels of 58Zn to deduce the 57Cu(p,γ)58Zn reaction rate. Nevertheless, the order of the 1+1 and 2+3 resonance states that dominate at 0:2 ≲ T(GK) ≲ 0:8 is not confirmed. The 1+2 resonance state, which dominates at the XRB sensitive temperature regime 0:8 ≲ T(GK) ≲ 2 was not detected. Using isobaric-multipletmass equation (IMME), we estimate the order of the 1+1 and 2+3 resonance states and estimate the lower limit of the 1+2 resonance energy. We then determine the 57Cu(p,γ)58Zn reaction rate using the full pf -model space shell model calculations. The new rate is up to a factor of four lower than the Forstner et al. [3] rate recommended by JINA REACLIBv2.2. Using the present 57Cu(p,γ)58Zn, the latest 56Ni(p,γ)57Cu and 55Ni(p,γ)56Cu reaction rates, and 1D implicit hydrodynamic Kepler code, we model the thermonuclear XRBs of the clocked burster GS 1826–24. We find that the new rates regulate the reaction flow in the NiCu cycles and strongly influence the burst-ash composition. The 59Cu(p,γ)56Ni and 59Cu(p,α)60Zn reactions suppress the influence of the 57Cu(p,γ)58Zn reaction. They strongly diminish the impact of the nuclear reaction flow that bypasses the 56Ni waiting point induced by the 55Ni(p,γ)56Cu reaction on burst light curve.

Availability note (English)

Available from https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2022/04/epjconf_nic16th2022_11023.pdf; https://doaj.org/article/fa43d427d9fb46e4944ddb2347cf9c20

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
EPJ. Web of Conferences
Journal Volume
260
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
2100-014X

Conference

Title
16. International Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos
Dates
21-25 Sep 2021
Place
Chengdu (China)