Proposed radiological criteria for pre-operative determination of resectability in peritoneal-based malignancies
Creators
- 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore (Senegal)
- 2. Division of Oncologic Imaging, National Cancer Centre Singapore (Senegal)
- 3. IBM Research Collaboratory (Senegal)
- 4. Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore (Senegal)
- 5. National Cancer Centre Singapore (Senegal)
Description
The selection of patients for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy infusion (HIPEC) is important, and relies heavily on imaging. However, it has been reported that Computer Tomographic (CT) scans may only achieve a low sensitivity of 33% for peritoneal disease. We propose a set of radiological criteria for pre-operative determination of resectability of peritoneal disease in peritoneal-based malignancies and validate this in our cohort of patients. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparotomy with a view for CRS and HIPEC, at the National Cancer Centre Singapore from January 2000 to April 2010, was performed. Intra-operative Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) scores were recorded. The pre-operative imaging was reviewed with a senior radiologist who was blinded, and recorded the radiological PCI scores (CT-PCI) and eight additional CT prognostic factors (CT-PF). The CT-PCI and CT-PF scores were then compared with the intra-operative findings to determine the radiological accuracy. The scores and the individual prognostic factors were then evaluated for their predictive ability for unresectability. Comparison of the CT-PCI and PCI scores showed a concordance correlation coefficient at 0.52 (95% CI 0.34–0.7). Accuracy was increased with the addition CT-PF. The presence of omental caking and ascites were predictors of unresectability. We propose a scoring system which is able to predict for unresectable disease with a specificity of 80% and a sensitivity of 62%. With our proposed criteria, and scoring system, the selection of patients for CRS and HIPEC can be improved, and unnecessary exploratory operations avoided.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12456Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
- Journal Volume
- 60
- Journal Issue
- 3
- Journal Page Range
- p. 337-343
- ISSN
- 1754-9477
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Australia
- Country of Input or Organization
- Australia
- INIS RN
- 47112046
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARCINOMAS; CHEMOTHERAPY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTRAPERITONEAL INJECTION; PATIENTS; PERITONEUM; RADIOLOGY; RECOMMENDATIONS; REVIEWS; SURGERY
- Descriptors DEC
- DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; INJECTION; INTAKE; MEDICINE; MEMBRANES; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PROCESSING; SEROUS MEMBRANES; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Notes
- 2 figs., 5 tabs.