Published February 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

A continuous bivariate model for wind power density and wind turbine energy output estimations

  • 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus de Tafira s/n, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands (Spain)
  • 2. Department of Renewable Energies and Water, Technological Institute of the Canary Islands, Pozo Izquierdo Beach s/n, 35119 Santa Lucia, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands (Spain)

Description

The wind power probability density function is useful in both the design process of a wind turbine and in the evaluation process of the wind resource available at a potential site. The continuous probability models used in the scientific literature to estimate the wind power density distribution function and wind turbine energy output assume that air density is independent of the wind speed. A constant annual value for air density of 1.225 kg m-3, corresponding to standard conditions (sea level, 15 oC), is generally used. A bivariate probability model (BPM) is presented in this paper for wind power density and wind turbine energy output estimations. This model takes into account the time variability of air density and wind speed, as well as the correlation existing between both variables. Contingency type bivariate distributions with specified marginal distributions have been used for this purpose. The proposed model is applied in this paper to meteorological data (temperature, pressure, relative humidity, wind speed) recorded over a one year period at a weather station located at the facilities of the Technological Institute of the Canary Islands (Spain). The conclusion reached is that the BPM presented in this paper is more realistic than the univariate probability models (UPMs) normally used in the scientific literature. In the particular case under study, and for all the situations analysed, the BPM has provided values for the annual mean wind power density and annual energy output of a wind turbine that fit the sample data better than the UPMs. However, as a result of the climatological characteristics of the area where the analysis was performed, the results do not differ notably from those obtained through the use of a UPM and the mean air density of the area

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enconman.2006.06.019;
PII
S0196-8904(06)00223-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Conversion and Management
Journal Volume
48
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 420-432
ISSN
0196-8904
CODEN
ECMADL

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
39012089
Subject category
S17: WIND ENERGY;
Descriptors DEI
CANARY ISLANDS; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; HUMIDITY; METEOROLOGY; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTIONS; SEA LEVEL; WEATHER; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINES
Descriptors DEC
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENERGY SOURCES; EQUIPMENT; EUROPE; FUNCTIONS; ISLANDS; LEVELS; MACHINERY; MOISTURE; POWER; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SPAIN; TURBINES; TURBOMACHINERY; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.