Published March 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Virtual unenhanced CT images acquired from dual-energy CT urography: Accuracy of attenuation values and variation with contrast material phase

  • 1. Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)

Description

Aim: To determine how representative virtual unenhanced (VNE) images are of true unenhanced (TNE) images when performing computed tomography (CT) urography on a dual-energy CT (DECT) system, and whether the images are affected by the contrast material phase. Materials and methods: In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant study, TNE were compared with VNE images derived from the nephrographic (VNEn) and excretory (VNEe) phases in 100 consecutive CT urograms. Two readers in consensus measured attenuation values of abdominal organs, fat, and renal lesions (>1 cm). Image noise was correlated with patient thickness. Detectability of renal stones was evaluated. Image quality and acceptability was assessed using a five-point scale. Expected dose saving by removing the TNE phase was calculated. Results: VNE attenuation values of liver, renal parenchyma, and aorta were significantly different to TNE values (p < 0.05); spleen and fat attenuation values showed no significant difference. No significant difference was found between VNEn and VNEe images. Image noise was significantly greater in TNE images (p < 0.0001) and correlated with patient thickness. VNEn and VNEe images had sensitivities of 76.6 and 65.6% for detection of stones, identifying all stones greater than 3 and 4 mm, respectively. Both VNE images received significantly lower image quality scores than TNE images (p < 0.0001); however, the majority of images were deemed acceptable. The mean theoretical dose saving by removing the TNE phase was 35%. Conclusion: Although VNE images demonstrate high reader acceptability, accuracy of attenuation values and detection of small stones is limited. The contrast material phase, however, does not affect attenuation values. Further validation of VNE images is recommended prior to clinical implementation

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2012.08.004

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.crad.2012.08.004;
PII
S0009-9260(12)00428-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Clinical Radiology
Journal Volume
68
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 264-271
ISSN
0009-9260
CODEN
CLRAAG

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
45077302
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
AORTA; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; IMAGE PROCESSING; KIDNEYS; LIVER; SPLEEN
Descriptors DEC
ARTERIES; BLOOD VESSELS; BODY; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; GLANDS; ORGANS; PROCESSING; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.