Impact of patient weight on tumor visibility based on human-shaped phantom simulation study in PET imaging system
- 1. Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang (Malaysia)
- 2. Center of Diagnostic Nuclear Imaging, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang (Malaysia)
- 3. Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Description
Energy window technique has been implemented in all positron emission tomography (PET) imaging protocol, with the aim to remove the unwanted low energy photons. Current practices in our institution however are performed by using default energy threshold level regardless of the weight of the patient. Phantom size, which represents the size of the patient's body, is the factor that determined the level of scatter fraction during PET imaging. Thus, the motivation of this study is to determine the optimum energy threshold level for different sizes of human-shaped phantom, to represent underweight, normal, overweight and obese patients. In this study, the scanner was modeled by using Monte Carlo code, version MCNP5. Five different sizes of elliptical-cylinder shaped of human-sized phantoms with diameter ranged from 15 to 30 cm were modeled. The tumor was modeled by a cylindrical line source filled with 1.02 MeV positron emitters at the center of the phantom. Various energy window widths, in the ranged of 10–50% were implemented to the data. In conclusion, the phantom mass volume did influence the scatter fraction within the volume. Bigger phantom caused more scattering events and thus led to coincidence counts lost. We evaluated the impact of phantom sizes on the sensitivity and visibility of the simulated models. Implementation of wider energy window improved the sensitivity of the system and retained the coincidence photons lost. Visibility of the tumor improved as an appropriate energy window implemented for the different sizes of phantom. - Highlights: • Optimizing the energy window improved the sensitivity of the PET system. • Improving the visibility of the tumors using the optimized energy window. • Recommendations on the optimized energy windows for different body sizes. • Using simulated phantom using MCNP to determine various body sizes
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.05.039Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.05.039;
- PII
- S0969-806X(15)00215-7;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiation Physics and Chemistry (1993)
- Journal Volume
- 115
- Journal Page Range
- p. 81-87
- ISSN
- 0969-806X
- CODEN
- RPCHDM
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47055281
- Subject category
- S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- IMAGES; IMPLEMENTATION; M CODES; MEV RANGE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NEOPLASMS; OPTIMIZATION; PATIENTS; PHANTOMS; POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; POSITRONS; SENSITIVITY
- Descriptors DEC
- ANTILEPTONS; ANTIMATTER; ANTIPARTICLES; CALCULATION METHODS; COMPUTER CODES; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; ELEMENTARY PARTICLES; EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENERGY RANGE; FERMIONS; LEPTONS; MATTER; MOCKUP; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.