Published August 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Using LIBS to diagnose melanoma in biomedical fluids deposited on solid substrates: Limits of direct spectral analysis and capability of machine learning

  • 1. Institute of Nanotechnology, CNR-NANOTEC, c/o Department of Chemistry, University of Bari, 70126 Bari (Italy)
  • 2. Department of Physics and Applied Physics, Kennedy College of Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, MA 01854 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Computer Sciences, Kennedy College of Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, MA 01854 (United States)
  • 4. Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, New York, NY 10065 (United States)
  • 5. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 (United States)
  • 6. Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, New York, NY 10065 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • LIBS analysis of biological fluids harvested from mice with melanoma and healthy controls. • No discrimination between healthy and diseased mice with direct analysis of LIBS spectra • Comparison of the classification accuracy provided by four machine learning methods (LDA, FDA, SVM, Gradient boost) • Comparison of the classification accuracy obtained with four substrates (PVDF, Cu, Al, Si) • Carefully selected substrate and algorithm yield 97% classification accuracy Diagnosis is crucial to increase the success rate of cancer treatments as well as the survival rate and life quality of patients, in particular for forms of cancer that remain largely asymptomatic until metastasis. Methodologies that allow the diagnosis of early-stage tumors as well as the detection of residual disease have the potential to improve cancer control and help monitor therapeutic outcomes. In this work, we report a Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) approach to early diagnosis of a form of skin cancer, melanoma, based on the analysis of biological fluids (blood and tissue homogenates) harvested from diseased mice and healthy controls. We acquired femtosecond LIBS spectra and used two different approaches for the analysis: through comparison of the emission intensity of selected analytes in healthy and diseased samples; and by using machine learning classification algorithms (LDA, Linear Discriminant Analysis; FDA, Fisher Discriminant Analysis; SVM, Support Vector Machines; and Gradient Boosting). We also addressed the effect of substrates on the analysis of liquid samples, by using four different substrates (PVDF, Cu, Al, Si) and comparing their performance. We show that with a combination of the most appropriate substrate and algorithm, we are able to discriminate between healthy and diseased mice with accuracy up to 96% while direct analysis of LIBS spectra did not provide any conclusive results. These series of results demonstrate that carefully designed LIBS measurements combined with machine learning can be a powerful and practical approach for the diagnosis of cancer.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2018.05.010

Additional details

Additional titles

Augmented title (English)
LIBS;Diagnosis of cancer;Melanoma;Machine learning;Biological fluid analysis;Effect of substrate

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.sab.2018.05.010;
PII
S0584854718301290;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Spectrochimica Acta. Part B, Atomic Spectroscopy
Journal Volume
146
Journal Page Range
p. 106-114
ISSN
0584-8547
CODEN
SAASBH

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.