Published December 7, 2004 | Version v1
Journal article

The impact of inter-fraction dose variations on biological equivalent dose (BED): the concept of equivalent constant dose

  • 1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria (Canada)
  • 2. Department of Medical Physics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria (Canada)

Description

Inter-fraction dose fluctuations, which appear as a result of setup errors, organ motion and treatment machine output variations, may influence the radiobiological effect of the treatment even when the total delivered physical dose remains constant. The effect of these inter-fraction dose fluctuations on the biological effective dose (BED) has been investigated. Analytical expressions for the BED accounting for the dose fluctuations have been derived. The concept of biological effective constant dose (BECD) has been introduced. The equivalent constant dose (ECD), representing the constant physical dose that provides the same cell survival fraction as the fluctuating dose, has also been introduced. The dose fluctuations with Gaussian as well as exponential probability density functions were investigated. The values of BECD and ECD calculated analytically were compared with those derived from Monte Carlo modelling. The agreement between Monte Carlo modelled and analytical values was excellent (within 1%) for a range of dose standard deviations (0-100% of the dose) and the number of fractions (2 to 37) used in the comparison. The ECDs have also been calculated for conventional radiotherapy fields. The analytical expression for the BECD shows that BECD increases linearly with the variance of the dose. The effect is relatively small, and in the flat regions of the field it results in less than 1% increase of ECD. In the penumbra region of the 6 MV single radiotherapy beam the ECD exceeded the physical dose by up to 35%, when the standard deviation of combined patient setup/organ motion uncertainty was 5 mm. Equivalently, the ECD field was ∼2 mm wider than the physical dose field. The difference between ECD and the physical dose is greater for normal tissues than for tumours

Availability note (English)

Available online at http://stacks.iop.org/0031-9155/49/5333/pmb4_23_010.pdf or at the Web site for the journal Physics in Medicine and Biology (ISSN 1361-6560) http://www.iop.org/

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Journal Volume
49
Journal Issue
23
Journal Page Range
p. 5333-5345
ISSN
0031-9155
CODEN
PHMBA7