Published December 1995
| Version v1
Journal article
How dangerous is low level radiation?
Description
Problems in the threshold basis for the linear-no threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis are reviewed, and it is shown that they very strongly suggest that the theory greatly overestimates the risk of low level radiation. A direct test of the theory, based on the radon-lung cancer relationship is described; it strongly reinforces that conclusion. However, it is shown that even if the linear-no threshold theory is valid; the public's fear of low level radiation, at least in some contexts, is grossly exaggerated. 30 refs., 2 figs., 3 tabs
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Risk Analysis
- Journal Volume
- 15
- Journal Issue
- 6
- Journal Page Range
- p. 645-653.
- ISSN
- 0272-4332
- CODEN
- RIANDF
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 27040915
- Subject category
- S63: RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARCINOGENESIS; HEALTH HAZARDS; IONIZING RADIATIONS; PUBLIC OPINION; RADIATION DOSES; RADON; THRESHOLD DOSE
- Descriptors DEC
- ELEMENTS; HAZARDS; NONMETALS; PATHOGENESIS; RADIATIONS; RARE GASES