Published January 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Quantities versus prices for best social welfare in carbon reduction: A literature review

  • 1. Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing, Beijing 100081 (China)
  • 2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Energy Economics and Environmental Management, Beijing 100081 (China)
  • 3. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081 (China)
  • 4. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081 (China)

Description

Highlights: • Prices versus quantities analysis for best welfare on carbon reduction are introduced. • Supplementary research on carbon reduction policy decision with prices versus quantities are summarized for the first time. • The evolution of hybrid carbon reduction policies is presented. • Further improvements of prices versus quantities for carbon reduction are proposed. -- Abstract: Weitzman's price-quantity analysis framework has been widely used, and in the field of climate economy it is applied to choose proper emissions reduction instruments for best welfare under uncertainty. This article summarizes the principle and method of selecting carbon emission reduction instruments by price versus quantities decision criterion. The probability of uncontrollable outcomes under uncertainty is reduced by comparing marginal abatement costs with marginal abatement benefits. On this basis, the following outreach research are summarized on some key issues such as dynamic analysis, assumptions improvements, elements expansion and hybrid policies. This topic drives a lot of research but no review has been conducted. We sum up the time-correlated cost and multi-period policy research to extend the static framework to dynamic analysis. There are also many studies that relax the strong assumptions of original framework including correlated uncertainty between cost and benefit, stock effect of carbon, nonlinear marginal cost and benefit, distributional inefficiency and extension of partial equilibrium. In addition, more elements around emissions control have been included and specified such as uncertainty, incomplete enforcement, technology innovation and multiple pollutants. We also summarize the researches of hybrid policy which combines quantity and price control to be a new regulation method and dual regulation which suggest applying both quantity and price control in different departments. It is found that early researches favor carbon tax while quantity regulation has gradually become popular. Finally, this article puts forward some research directions worth more exploring at both theory and application level.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.018;
PII
S0306261918315642;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Energy
Journal Volume
233
Journal Page Range
p. 554-564
ISSN
0306-2619
CODEN
APENDX

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55008012
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
CLIMATES; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS; POLLUTANTS; POLLUTION CONTROL; PRICES; REGULATIONS; TAXES
Descriptors DEC
CONTROL; ECONOMICS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; LAWS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.