Multi-arterial phase MRI depicts inconsistent arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) subtypes in liver observations of patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma
Creators
- 1. Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, 92093, La Jolla, CA (United States)
- 2. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, 92182, San Diego, CA (United States)
- 3. Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, 409-3898, Chuo, Yamanashi (Japan)
- 4. Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, 170 Jomaru-ro, Jung 1ildong, Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do (Korea, Republic of)
- 5. ABC Medical Center, Av. Carlos Fernández Graef 154, Santa Fe, Contadero, Cuajimalpa de Morelos, 05330, Ciudad de México, CDMX (Mexico)
- 6. National Cancer Center, 809 Madu 1il-dong, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do (Korea, Republic of)
- 7. Wonkwang University Hospital, 895 Muwang-ro, Iksan-si, Jeollabuk-do (Korea, Republic of)
- 8. Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, 26, Daesingongwon-ro, Seo-gu, 49201, Busan (Korea, Republic of)
Description
According to LI-RADS, a major discriminating feature between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC malignancies is the subtype of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE). The aim of this study was to investigate whether APHE subtypes are consistent across multi-arterial phase (mHAP) MRI acquisitions while evaluating reader agreement. Secondarily, we investigated factors that may affect reader agreement for APHE subtype. In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis and focal observations who underwent mHAP were included. Five radiologists reviewed MR images in 2 reading sessions. In reading session 1, individual AP series were reviewed and scored for presence of APHE and subtype. In reading session 2, readers scored observations' major and ancillary features and LI-RADS category in the complete MRI examination. Reader agreement was calculated using Fleiss' kappa for binary outcomes and Kendall's coefficient of concordance for LI-RADS categories. Univariate mixed effects logistic regressions were performed to investigate factors affecting agreement. In total, 61 patients with 77 focal observations were analyzed. Of observations unanimously scored as having APHE, 27.7% showed both rim and nonrim subtypes on mHAP. Inter-reader agreement for APHE subtype ranged from 0.49 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.64) to 0.57 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.74) between reading sessions. Observation size had a trend level effect on rim APHE agreement (p = 0.052). Approximately 1/3 of observations demonstrated inconsistent APHE subtype during mHAP acquisition. Small lesions were particularly challenging. Further guidance on APHE subtype classification, especially when applied to mHAP, could be a focus of LI-RADS refinement.
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07924-8Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Radiology (Internet)
- Journal Volume
- 31
- Journal Issue
- 10
- Journal Page Range
- p. 7594-7604
- ISSN
- 1432-1084
- CODEN
- EURAE3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 53002643
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CLASSIFICATION; HEPATOMAS; IMAGE PROCESSING; LIVER; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; NMR IMAGING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; REVIEWS
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; CARCINOMAS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM DISEASES; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; GLANDS; MATHEMATICS; NEOPLASMS; ORGANS; PROCESSING; STATISTICS