Published April 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

First-principles study of Cu/TiN and Al/TiN interfaces: weak versus strong interfaces

  • 1. Materials Science and Technology Division, MST-8, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545,USA (United States)
  • 2. Materials Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269,USA (United States)
  • 3. Materials Physics and Applications Division, MPA-CINT, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 (United States)

Description

Using density functional theory based first-principles calculations, we show that the preferred interfacial plane orientation relationship is determined by the strength of bonding at the interface. The thermodynamic stability, and the ideal tensile and shear strengths of Cu(1 1 1)/TiN(1 1 1) and Al(1 1 1)/TiN(1 1 1) interfaces are calculated. While there is a strong orientation relation preference for the Al/TiN interface, there is no orientation relation preference for the Cu/TiN interface. Both the ideal tensile and shear strengths of Cu/TiN interfaces are lower than those of bulk Cu and TiN, suggesting such interfaces are weaker than their bulk components. By comparison, the ideal strengths of the Al/TiN interface are comparable to the constituents in the bulk form. Such contrasting interfaces can be a test-bed for studying the role of interfaces in determining the mechanical behavior of the nanolayered structures. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/22/3/035020

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
Journal Volume
22
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
[11 p.]
ISSN
0965-0393