Published June 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Scaling the robustness of the solutions for quantum controllable problems

  • 1. Department of Physics, ORT-Braude College, P.O. Box 78, 21982 Karmiel (Israel)
  • 2. The Institute of Chemistry, Hebrew University, 91904 Jerusalem (Israel)

Description

The major task in quantum control theory is to find an external field that transforms the system from one state to another or executes a predetermined unitary transformation. We investigate the difficulty of computing the control field as the size of the Hilbert space is increased. In the models studied the controls form a small closed subalgebra of operators. Complete controllability is obtained by the commutators of the controls with the stationary Hamiltonian. We investigate the scaling of the computation effort required to converge a solution for the quantum control task with respect to the size of the Hilbert space. The models studied include the double-well Bose Hubbard model with the SU(2) control subalgebra and the Morse oscillator with the Heisenberg-Weil algebra. We find that for initial and target states that are classified as generalized coherent states (GCSs) of the control subalgebra the control field is easily found independent of the size of the Hilbert space. For such problems, a control field generated for a small system can serve as a pilot for finding the field for larger systems. Attempting to employ pilot fields that generate superpositions of GCSs or cat states failed. No relation was found between control solutions of different Hilbert space sizes. In addition the task of finding such a field scales unfavorably with Hilbert space sizes. We demonstrate the use of symmetry to obtain quantum transitions between states without phase information. Implications to quantum computing are discussed.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physical Review. A
Journal Volume
83
Journal Issue
6
Journal Page Range
p. 063412-063412.7
ISSN
1050-2947
CODEN
PLRAAN

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2011 American Institute of Physics