Published October 1, 2008 | Version v1
Journal article

Asperity contacts at the nanoscale: Comparison of Ru and Au

  • 1. Department of Physics, Yeshiva University, 500 West 185th Street, New York, New York 10033 (United States)
  • 2. Materials and Engineering Physics, Ames Laboratory, Ames, Iowa 50011 (United States)

Description

We develop and validate an interatomic potential for ruthenium based on the embedded atom method framework with the Finnis/Sinclair representation. We confirm that the potential yields a stable hcp lattice with reasonable lattice and elastic constants and surface and stacking fault energies. We employ molecular dynamics simulations to bring two surfaces together, one flat and the other with a single asperity. We compare the process of asperity contact formation and breaking in Au and Ru, two materials currently in use in microelectromechanical system switches. While Au is very ductile at 150 and 300 K, Ru shows considerably less plasticity at 300 and 600 K (approximately the same homologous temperature). In Au, the asperity necks down to a single atom thick bridge at separation. While similar necking occurs in Ru at 600 K, it is much more limited than in Au. On the other hand, at 300 K, Ru breaks by a much more brittle process of fracture/decohesion with limited plastic deformation

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Applied Physics
Journal Volume
104
Journal Issue
7
Journal Page Range
p. 074320-074320.9
ISSN
0021-8979
CODEN
JAPIAU

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2008 American Institute of Physics