Published February 2020
| Version v1
Journal article
Superiority of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with skull-base invasion
Creators
- 1. Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University. Department of Radiation Oncology (China)
- 2. Guilin People's Hospital. Department of Neurosurgery (China)
- 3. Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital. Department of Radiation Oncology (China)
- 4. Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Department of Radiation Oncology (China)
- 5. People's Hospital of Gongcheng Yao Autonomous County. Department of Oncology (China)
Description
Purpose
: To compare the clinical results and functional outcomes between two-dimensional conventional radiation therapy (2DRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with skull-base invasion.Methods
: A total of 1258 patients were subclassified into two groups: mild skull-base invasion group (792; 63%) and severe skull-base invasion group (466; 37%). Patients were pair matched (1:1 ratio) using six clinical factors into 2DRT or IMRT groups. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression model were performed to assess overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Toxicities were evaluated.Results
: IMRT significantly improved four-year OS compared with 2DRT (65.6% vs. 81.8%, P = 0.000), DFS (57.3% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.000) and LRRFS (76.5% vs. 87.5%, P = 0.003) in NPC with severe skull-base invasion, but similar results were observed in patients with mild skull-base invasion (P > 0.05). In patients with severe invasion, radiation therapy techniques were found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 0.457, P = 0.000), DFS (HR = 0.547, P = 0.000) and LRRFS (HR = 0.503, P = 0.004). IMRT was associated with better OS. In subgroups analysis, IMRT group also had a better survival in OS, DFS (P < 0.05 for all rates) for patients received concurrent chemotherapy and sequential chemotherapy compared to 2DRT in the severe invasion group. The IMRT group displayed lower incidence of mucositis, xerostomia, trismus (< 1 cm) and temporal lobe necrosis than the 2DRT group.Conclusions
: IMRT significantly improved patient survival compared with 2DRT in NPC patients with severe skull-base invasion, but a similar survival rate was noted in mild invasion patients. Chemotherapy can improve survival in NPC patients with severe invasion. Among the two therapies, IMRT significantly decreased therapy-related toxicity.Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
- Journal Volume
- 146
- Journal Issue
- 2
- Journal Page Range
- p. 429-439
- ISSN
- 0171-5216
- CODEN
- JCROD7
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 55072457
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARCINOMAS; CHEMOTHERAPY; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; FRACTIONATED IRRADIATION; HEAD; METASTASES; NECROSIS; PATIENTS; PHARYNX; PROCTITIS; RADIOTHERAPY; SKULL; SURVIVAL CURVES; TOXICITY
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM DISEASES; DISEASES; EVALUATION; IRRADIATION; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES; RADIOLOGY; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; SKELETON; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019