Thermodynamic and techno-economic assessment of pure and zeotropic fluid ORCs for waste heat recovery in a biomass IGCC plant
Creators
- 1. Laboratory of Steam Boilers and Thermal Plants, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou (Greece)
Description
Highlights: • Thermodynamic assessment of WHR-ORCs to recover heat from biomass IGCCs with CCS. • Zeotropic mixture ORCs have slightly superior thermodynamic and techno-economic performance. • Maximum plant efficiency improvement (2.81%) is achieved in syngas cooling scenario. • Combined integration scenario results in plant efficiency improvement by 4.61% • LCOE of syngas cooling and combined integration scenarios is 35.42 and 49.76 €/MWhe. The present study includes a thermodynamic and techno-economic assessment of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery (WHR) from three types of waste heat sources in biomass-fuelled integrated gasification combined cycle (BIGCC) plants equipped with carbon capture and storage (CCS). These include (1) the air separation unit (ASU) air compression intercoolers, (2) the CCS CO2 compression intercoolers and (3) syngas cooler at the water gas shift reactor outlet. The use of ORCs operating with pure working fluids and zeotropic mixtures is investigated. In each scenario, the optimal cycles that maximize plant efficiency improvement are determined and are subsequently economically evaluated. Among the three, the syngas cooling integration scenario leads to the highest plant efficiency improvement (2.81%) and best economic performance, showing a levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and discounted payback period (DPP) of 35.42–35.67 €/MWhe and 5.7–5.8 years. Meanwhile, if all three heat sources are utilized, an efficiency improvement of 4.61% is achieved, while the corresponding LCOE and DPP are about 49.76–51.08 €/MWhe and 9.3–9.7 years. In all scenarios, the best thermodynamic and economic results are obtained by ORCs operating with mixtures. Despite their thermodynamic superiority, however, zeotropic ORCs have a relatively small economic advantage over pure fluid cycles.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116202Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116202;
- PII
- S1359431120336814;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Applied Thermal Engineering
- Journal Volume
- 183
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 1359-4311
- CODEN
- ATENFT
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53112917
- Subject category
- S09: BIOMASS FUELS; S42: ENGINEERING;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMBINED CYCLES; ELECTRICITY; GASIFICATION; HEAT EXCHANGERS; HEAT RECOVERY; HEAT SOURCES; PERFORMANCE; RANKINE CYCLE; THERMODYNAMICS; WASTE HEAT; WATER GAS; WORKING FLUIDS
- Descriptors DEC
- AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; CONTROL; ENERGY; ENERGY RECOVERY; ENERGY SOURCES; FLUIDS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; HEAT; INTERMEDIATE BTU GAS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; POLLUTION CONTROL; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SEPARATION PROCESSES; THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES; WASTES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.