TRUE Block Scale Continuation Project. Final Report
Creators
- 1. Geosigma AB (Sweden)
- 2. Itasca Consultants SA (France)
- 3. Royal Inst. of Technology, Stockholm (Sweden)
- 4. Golder Associates Inc. (United States)
- 5. Golder Associates AB (Sweden)
- 6. VTT (FI)
- 7. Terralogica AB (SE)
- 8. Conterra AB (SE)
Description
The TRUE Block Scale project was carried out during 1996-2002. This project focused on site characterisation and building of hydrostructural and microstructural models, sorbing tracer experiments in single structures and networks of structures over distances ranging between 1 and 100 m and also involved a unified application of various model approaches for modelling the in situ experiments. In 2002, ANDRA, Posiva, JNC and SKB decided to pursue some remaining issues in the so-called TRUE Block Scale Continuation project (TRUE BS2). The specific objectives of BS2 can be summarised as: 'Improve understanding of transport pathways at the block scale, including assessment of effects of geology and geometry, macrostructure and microstructure'. In order to cater to addressing the stated objective a series of hypotheses were formulated which explored the importance of geological information for predicting transport and retention and the possible differences between transport and retention between transport paths dominated by faults and those dominated by non-fault fractures (background fractures). In the process, prospects for carrying out experiments in fracture networks over longer distances (c 20-100 m) were explored. It was identified that experiments with sorbing tracers over these distances were prohibitive because of the time frames involved and the projected low mass recoveries. Instead the experimental locus was shifted to a geological structure previously not investigated by tracer tests in the TRUE Block Scale experiments. The lower immobile zone retention material properties assigned to background fractures compared to those assigned to the fault-type Structure 19 have been verified by means of back-calculations. The evaluated Type 1 flow path (Structure 19, Flow path I) retention material properties, as expressed by κ parameter, are one order of magnitude higher than for the background fracture flow path. This finding is consistent with the developed microstructural model. It is noted that the observed difference is applicable to experimental time scales while at longer time scales the retention capacity of the fault type fractures may become saturated. The overall retention (taking effects of both κ and β into account) in the background fracture Flow path II is found to be about one order of magnitude higher than for Flow path I. This finding is attributed to the fact that that the flow rate is significantly lower compared with Flow path I, resulting in longer residence times. The presented results are consistent with Flow path I being contained in a planar structure with immobile zones assigned according to the microstructural model. Similarly, the results suggest Flow path II is being made up of a set of background fractures, including BG1. The uncertainty associated with the analysis and interpretations has been evaluated quantitatively, demonstrating that the uncertainty in the hydrodynamic (pathway length and velocity) parameter group β is higher than that for the retention (physical and geochemical) parameter group κ. This analysis supports the development of more realistic hydrostructural models with uncertainty represented through discrete fracture network (DFN) simulations for radionuclide transport in crystalline rock. The analysis (prediction and evaluation) made of the TRUE Block Scale Continuation tracer tests demonstrates clearly that a good geological basis (as expressed in the developed hydrostructural and microstructure models) is important for understanding sorbing tracer transport in fractured crystalline rock.The quantitative analysis pertaining to the background fracture Flow path II suggests that background fracture flow paths, although with poor material retention properties, may contribute significantly to retention because of the low flow rates expected in them. Given that the current results are based on one sole experimental result there exists a need to further substantiate the present findings
Availability note (English)
Available from INIS in electronic form; Also available from: http://www.skb.se/upload/publications/pdf/TR-06-42webb.pdfFiles
38093203.pdf
Files
(6.2 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:227d5bfd4fe537069c988876de38ec22
|
6.2 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- 159 p.
- ISSN
- 1404-0344
- Report number
- SKB-TR--06-42
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Sweden
- Country of Input or Organization
- Sweden
- INIS RN
- 38093203
- Subject category
- S12: MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES;
- Descriptors DEI
- GEOLOGIC MODELS; RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL; RADIONUCLIDE MIGRATION; RETENTION; SORPTION; UNDERGROUND DISPOSAL
- Descriptors DEC
- ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT; MANAGEMENT; MASS TRANSFER; RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT
Optional Information
- Notes
- 61 refs., 67 figs., 63 tabs.