Net energy benefits of carbon nanotube applications
- 1. Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA (United States)
- 2. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA (United States)
Description
Highlights: • Life cycle net energy benefits are examined. • CNT-enabled and the conventional technologies are compared. • Flash memory with CNT switches show significant positive net energy benefit. • Lithium-ion batteries with MWCNT cathodes show positive net energy benefit. • Lithium-ion batteries with SWCNT anodes tend to exhibit negative net energy benefit. - Abstract: Implementation of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in various applications can reduce material and energy requirements of products, resulting in energy savings. However, processes for the production of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are energy-intensive and can require extensive purification. In this study, we investigate the net energy benefits of three CNT-enabled technologies: multi-walled CNT (MWCNT) reinforced cement used as highway construction material, single-walled CNT (SWCNT) flash memory switches used in cell phones and CNT anodes and cathodes used in lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles. We explore the avoided or additional energy requirement in the manufacturing and use phases and estimate the life cycle net energy benefits for each application. Additional scenario analysis and Monte Carlo simulation of parameter uncertainties resulted in probability distributions of net energy benefits, indicating that net energy benefits are dependent on the application with confidence intervals straddling the breakeven line in some cases. Analysis of simulation results reveals that SWCNT switch flash memory and MWCNT Li-ion battery cathodes have statistically significant positive net energy benefits (α = 0.05) and SWCNT Li-ion battery anodes tend to have negative net energy benefits, while positive results for MWCNT-reinforced cement were significant only under an efficient CNT production scenario and a lower confidence level (α = 0.1).
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.001Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.001;
- PII
- S0306-2619(16)30451-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Applied Energy
- Journal Volume
- 173
- Journal Page Range
- p. 624-634
- ISSN
- 0306-2619
- CODEN
- APENDX
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48001572
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BREAKEVEN; CARBON NANOTUBES; CEMENTS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; IMPLEMENTATION; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LITHIUM ION BATTERIES; LITHIUM IONS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NET ENERGY; PURIFICATION; REINFORCED MATERIALS
- Descriptors DEC
- BUILDING MATERIALS; CALCULATION METHODS; CARBON; CHARGED PARTICLES; EFFICIENCY; ELECTRIC BATTERIES; ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS; ELEMENTS; ENERGY; ENERGY ANALYSIS; ENERGY BALANCE; ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS; ENERGY SYSTEMS; EVALUATION; IONS; MATERIALS; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTUBES; NONMETALS; SIMULATION
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.