The Sizewell inquiry - is there a better way
Creators
Description
The author sees the Inquiry as the latest in a line arising from government's wish to achieve greater public participation in controversial decisions. He believes that the Sizewell Inquiry is unlikely to shake the public out of its apathy, while a decision that goes against them will not satisfy the objectors. The concept of the Inquiry is based on the belief that the legal process will unearth objective truth, while most of the issues are matters of opinion and judgement. The wide-ranging terms of reference are leading to constitutional anomalies and attempts to take on Herculean tasks in the search for objective truth. However, while concluding that an Inquiry Commission adopting a legal approach and following courtroom procedures is not a satisfactory way of dealing with large-scale technological projects, the author finds it hard to suggest alternatives short of more direct parliamentary control. (author)
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 12
- Journal Issue
- 3
- Series
- Energy Policy.
- Journal Page Range
- 283-287
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- United Kingdom
- INIS RN
- 16011354
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS;
- Descriptors DEI
- GOVERNMENT POLICIES; LEGAL ASPECTS; PLANNING; PUBLIC OPINION; PWR TYPE REACTORS; SIZEWELL-B REACTOR; UNITED KINGDOM
- Descriptors DEC
- DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; EUROPE; POWER REACTORS; REACTORS; THERMAL REACTORS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS