Published May 2006 | Version v1
Journal article

A comparison of detailed level and superconfiguration models of neon

  • 1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, L-473, Livermore, CA 94550 (United States)
  • 2. Laboratoire Aime Cotton, Campus d'Orsay, Batiment 505, 91405 Orsay (France)
  • 3. CELIA, UMR 5107 Universite Bordeaux I-CEA-CNRS, 33405 Talence (France)

Description

The superconfiguration (SC) approach to collisional-radiative modeling can significantly decrease the computational demands of finding non-LTE level populations in complex systems. However, it has not yet been fully determined whether the statistical averaging of SC models leads to a significant loss of accuracy. The present work compares results from two independent models: a detailed-level accounting (DLA) model based on HULLAC data and the SC model MOST. The relatively simple level structures of the K- and L-shell ions of the neon test system ensure a tractable number of levels for the DLA model but challenge the statistical assumptions of the SC approach. Nonetheless, we find fair agreement between the two models for average ion charges, SC populations, and various effective temperatures

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2005.05.021;
PII
S0022-4073(05)00152-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
Journal Volume
99
Journal Issue
1-3
Journal Page Range
p. 272-282
ISSN
0022-4073
CODEN
JQSRAE

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
37063780
Subject category
S74: ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS;
Descriptors DEI
ACCURACY; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; IONS; L SHELL; LTE; NEON
Descriptors DEC
CHARGED PARTICLES; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; ELEMENTS; EQUILIBRIUM; EVALUATION; FLUIDS; GASES; NONMETALS; RARE GASES; SIMULATION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2005 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.