Published 2002 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

A study on the methodology for economic and environmental friendliness analysis of back-end nuclear fuel cycles

  • 1. Chosun Univ., Gwangju (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejon (Korea, Republic of)

Description

The economic and environmental friendliness analysis of the nuclear fuel cycle options that can be expected in Korea were performed. Options considered are direct disposal, reprocessing and DUPIC (Direct Use of Spent PWR Fuel In CANDU Reactors). By considering the result of calculation of the annual uranium requirement and nuclear spent fuel generation by analysis of nuclear fuel material flows in the nuclear fuel cycle options, we decided the time of back-end nuclear fuel cycle processes and the volume. Then we can analyze the economic and environmental friendliness by applying the unit cost and unit value of each process, respectively

Part of:
Proceedings of the first Asian and Oceanic Congress for Radiation Protection(AOCRP-1)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
KARP
Imprint Place
Taejon (Korea, Republic of)
Imprint Title
Proceedings of the first Asian and Oceanic Congress for Radiation Protection(AOCRP-1)
Imprint Pagination
[1 CD-ROM]
Journal Page Range
[12 p.]

Conference

Title
1. Asian and Oceanic Congress for Radiation Protection(AOCRP-1)
Dates
20-24 Oct 2002
Place
Seoul (Korea, Republic of)

INIS

Country of Publication
Korea, Republic of
Country of Input or Organization
Korea, Republic of
INIS RN
36053949
Subject category
S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
COMPUTER CALCULATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS; FUEL CYCLE; NUCLEAR FUELS; RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL; REPROCESSING
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY SOURCES; FUELS; MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS; RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT; REACTOR MATERIALS; SEPARATION PROCESSES; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT

Optional Information

Notes
8 refs, 6 figs, 6 tabs