Published September 1993 | Version v1
Report Open

The present status of the study on the validity of concurrent verbalization

  • 1. Japan Atomic Energy Research Inst., Tokai, Ibaraki (Japan). Tokai Research Establishment

Description

We reviewed study on the validity of the method of verbal reports. The method of verbal reports gives us detailed information about human cognitive process as compared with observing a sequence of actions, while it is subjected to criticism for the validity as data. Ericsson and Simon proposed a model of verbalization and investigated conditions to keep verbal reports valid. Although a lot of studies quote their model as a base of adopting the method of verbal reports, verification the validity of verbal reports is incomplete because effects of verbalization is not clear. We pointed out that it is necessary to take into consideration kinds of task strategies, effects of trial repetition, effects of task difficulty to examine precisely effects of verbalization. (author)

Availability note (English)

MF available from INIS under the Report Number.

Files

25028825.pdf

Files (1.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2cf818a5d9ee84dd345a5eeeada61352
1.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
42 p.
Report number
JAERI-M--93-166

INIS

Country of Publication
Japan
Country of Input or Organization
Japan
INIS RN
25028825
Subject category
S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
Descriptors DEI
BEHAVIOR; HUMAN FACTORS; INFORMATION; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; REACTOR OPERATION; REACTOR OPERATORS; TRAINING
Descriptors DEC
EDUCATION; OPERATION; PERSONNEL