Published September 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Reducing Ground-based Astrometric Errors with Gaia and Gaussian Processes

  • 1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (United States)
  • 2. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 (United States)
  • 3. Departamento de Física Matemática, Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, CP 66318, São Paulo, SP, 05314-970 (Brazil)
  • 4. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510 (United States)
  • 5. Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX (United Kingdom)
  • 6. Physics Department, 2320 Chamberlin Hall, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1150 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706-1390 (United States)
  • 7. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Pevensey Building, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH (United Kingdom)
  • 8. Department of Physics & Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT (United Kingdom)
  • 9. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology, P.O. Box 2450, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 (United States)
  • 10. Institut de Física d'Altes Energies (IFAE), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Campus UAB, E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona) (Spain)
  • 11. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (United States)
  • 12. INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, via G.B. Tiepolo 11, I-34143 Trieste (Italy)
  • 13. Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia—LIneA, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ—20921-400 (Brazil)

Description

Stochastic field distortions caused by atmospheric turbulence are a fundamental limitation to the astrometric accuracy of ground-based imaging. This distortion field is measurable at the locations of stars with accurate positions provided by the Gaia DR2 catalog; we develop the use of Gaussian process regression (GPR) to interpolate the distortion field to arbitrary locations in each exposure. We introduce an extension to standard GPR techniques that exploits the knowledge that the 2D distortion field is curl-free. Applied to several hundred 90 s exposures from the Dark Energy Survey as a test bed, we find that the GPR correction reduces the variance of the turbulent astrometric distortions ≈12× , on average, with better performance in denser regions of the Gaia catalog. The rms per-coordinate distortion in the riz bands is typically ≈7 mas before any correction and ≈2 mas after application of the GPR model. The GPR astrometric corrections are validated by the observation that their use reduces, from 10 to 5 mas rms, the residuals to an orbit fit to riz-band observations over 5 yr of the r = 18.5 trans-Neptunian object Eris. We also propose a GPR method, not yet implemented, for simultaneously estimating the turbulence fields and the 5D stellar solutions in a stack of overlapping exposures, which should yield further turbulence reductions in future deep surveys.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac0722

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Astronomical Journal (New York, N.Y. Online)
Journal Volume
162
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
[14 p.]
ISSN
1538-3881

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53077506
Subject category
S79: ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY; S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
Descriptors DEI
ACCURACY; ERRORS; GAUSSIAN PROCESSES; NONLUMINOUS MATTER; ORBITS; PERFORMANCE; STARS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TURBULENCE
Descriptors DEC
MATTER

Optional Information

Collaborations
DES Collaboration